Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals

Mastrangelo, Matías Enrique; Pérez‐Harguindeguy, Natalia; Enrico, Lucas; Bennett, Elena M.; Lavorel, Sandra; Cumming, Graeme S.; Abeygunawardane, Dilini; Amarilla, Leonardo; Burkhard, Benjamin; Egoh, Benis N.; Frishkoff, Luke O.; Galetto, Leonardo; Huber, Sibyl H.; Karp, Daniel S.; Ke, Alison; Kowaljow, Esteban; Kronenburg-García, Angela; Locatelli, Bruno; Martín‐López, Berta; Meyfroidt, Patrick; Mwampamba, Tuyeni H.; Nel, Jeanne; Nicholas, Kimberly A.; Nicholson, Charlie C.; Oteros‐Rozas, Elisa; Rahlao, Sebataolo; Raudsepp‐Hearne, Ciara; Ricketts, Taylor H.; Shrestha, Uttam Babu; Torres, Carolina; Winkler, Klara J.; Zoeller, Kim C.

doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0412-1

Cited by 213 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Handled by Shizuka Hashimoto, University of Tokyo, Japan management that are underpinned by the complex interactions between individual and societal values, rules and knowledge (IPBES 2019;Colloff et al 2017b). These interactions form part of the institutions, governance structure and societal dynamics that are increasingly recognised as one of the most relevant knowledge gaps in ecosystem service research (Mastrangelo et al 2019).…”

Section: Valuation Of Nature and Nature's Contributions To Peoplementioning

confidence: 99%

Decision-making for nature’s contributions to people in the Cape Floristic Region: the role of values, rules and knowledge

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nature conservation on privately owned land depends on land managers’ decision-making. Interactions between values, rules and knowledge (vrk) underpin decision-making, thus, it is important to understand these interactions to support conservation intentions. We investigated how different sets of vrk determine the decision-making context regarding the management and conservation of renosterveld, a critically endangered ecosystem in the Cape Floristic Region, and how this relates to land managers’ perceptions of nature’s contributions to people (NCP). From interviews with thirty land managers, we identified nine value types, four rule types, three knowledge types and 13 different NCP. We found that different vrk combinations can be grouped into three decision-making contexts: Bottom-up conservation, Top-down conservation and Utility. Each context is associated with the perception of different beneficial and detrimental NCP. Regulating NCP are perceived across all contexts, whereas more non-material NCP are associated with a Bottom-up conservation context and relational values, such as family ties. The prevalence of relational values in Bottom-up and Top-down conservation contexts illustrates the complexity and non-substitutability of the dynamic relationships between renosterveld and people. This indicates the importance of plural valuation in nature conservation to foster diverse NCP provided by renosterveld.

show abstract

Section: Valuation Of Nature and Nature's Contributions To Peoplementioning

confidence: 99%

Decision-making for nature’s contributions to people in the Cape Floristic Region: the role of values, rules and knowledge

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Taking into account ES is important for public policy making because ecosystems contribute significantly to human wellbeing. It is also essential to understand trade-offs among ES for landscape planning and management (Mastrángelo et al 2019). A trade-off situation occurs if a gain in one quality, quantity or property implies a loss of other aspects.…”

Section: Ecosystem Services and Social Equitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecosystem services and social equity: Who controls, who benefits and who loses?

Vallet¹,

Locatelli²,

Pramova³

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Es importante tomar en cuenta los SE para la formulación de políticas públicas, dada su considerable contribución al bienestar humano. También es fundamental entender de qué manera funcionan las compensaciones (tradeoffs) entre SE para la planificación y la gestión del paisaje (Mastrángelo et al 2019). Una situación de compensación se produce cuando un incremento o ganancia en calidad, cantidad o propiedad implica una pérdida en otros aspectos.…”

Section: Los Diferentes Actores De Los Servicios Ecosistémicos Y Sus unclassified

Servicios ecosistémicos y equidad social: ¿quién controla, quién se beneficia y quién pierde?

Vallet¹,

Locatelli²,

Pramova³

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals

Cited by 213 publications

References 38 publications

Decision-making for nature’s contributions to people in the Cape Floristic Region: the role of values, rules and knowledge

Decision-making for nature’s contributions to people in the Cape Floristic Region: the role of values, rules and knowledge

Ecosystem services and social equity: Who controls, who benefits and who loses?

Servicios ecosistémicos y equidad social: ¿quién controla, quién se beneficia y quién pierde?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About