2008 International Interconnect Technology Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iitc.2008.4546923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key factors to sustain the extension of a MHM-based integration scheme to medium and high porosity PECVD low-k materials

Abstract: Interconnect solutions for advanced technology nodes using PECVD techniques for low-k deposition require the use of porogen-based process with post deposition UV cure. By using two different UV cure lamps (A, B) in combination with different porogen loads, three different micro-porous low-k films are developed: Aurora ELK HM (k~2.5; porosity (P) ~25%), Aurora ELK A (k~2.3; P~34%) and Aurora ELK B (k~2.2; P~37%). Integrating these materials is complex and challenging. We discuss key factors that are instrumenta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To minimize the damage on the porous low-k material, low-k material optimization and resist strip condition are chosen, and the process integration modification has been provided. The integration approach for dual damascene patterning is transformed to "metal hardmask" method from 32 nm technology node as shown in Figure 2 [27]. In the metal hardmask method, the resist strip damage on the porous low-k material can be minimized because the resist is stripped prior to the trench and via etching.…”
Section: Copper Damascene Metallizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize the damage on the porous low-k material, low-k material optimization and resist strip condition are chosen, and the process integration modification has been provided. The integration approach for dual damascene patterning is transformed to "metal hardmask" method from 32 nm technology node as shown in Figure 2 [27]. In the metal hardmask method, the resist strip damage on the porous low-k material can be minimized because the resist is stripped prior to the trench and via etching.…”
Section: Copper Damascene Metallizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the process integration and resist strip conditions must be chosen carefully to minimize etch damage [55][56][57][58][59]. Hence, the process integration and resist strip conditions must be chosen carefully to minimize etch damage [55][56][57][58][59].…”
Section: Dielectric Patterningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These complicated methods are needed for patterning small features because the resist thickness must be reduced as feature size decreases to ensure an adequate process window for lithography [61]. However, there are a number of problems with the metal hardmask approach [56,57]. However, there are a number of problems with the metal hardmask approach [56,57].…”
Section: Dielectric Patterningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another form of surface damage is the presence of Cu residues on top of the LK/ULK surface, which can also further degrade the reliability margin against IMD breakdown [200]. Despite these difficulties, reasonably successful integration of SiCOH-based ULK BEOL has been demonstrated [205][206][207][208][209][210][211][212], even with BEOL stacks that include CoWP metal capping over Cu metallization [20,213,214]. Despite these difficulties, reasonably successful integration of SiCOH-based ULK BEOL has been demonstrated [205][206][207][208][209][210][211][212], even with BEOL stacks that include CoWP metal capping over Cu metallization [20,213,214].…”
Section: Low-k Types and Integrating Low-k Dielectricsmentioning
confidence: 99%