Key Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methods for Coal Companies

Abstract

Many businesses view sustainability issues as important and design corporate sustainability strategies. However, creating such a strategy does not mean the company will progress in sustainable development because the factors influencing businesses remain largely unexplored. Based on a review of studies on corporate sustainability, we identified the major factors affecting any company’s sustainability. They include government regulation, imperfect management, interaction with stakeholders, corporate self-regulation and self-reflection, and the regulatory framework, and can be consolidated into two groups. We also analyzed the groups of methods that can be used to assess a company’s sustainability: traditional corporate sustainability assessment methods, circular economy assessment methods, ESG assessment methods, and non-financial performance indicators. For each group of methods, limitations were identified, and it was concluded that corporate sustainability assessments should factor in the environment in which the company operates. As part of this study, a lack of methods for assessing the corporate sustainability of coal companies was revealed, along with insufficient consideration of industrial factors in the prior literature. These factors are responsible for incorrect corporate sustainability assessments in the coal industry. Taking into account the division of Russian coal companies into three types (energy companies, metal manufacturers, and coal producers) and the aspects of their functioning against the backdrop of economic restrictions (including sanctions and embargoes), the authors prove that each group of companies requires an individual corporate sustainability assessment methodology.

Strategic Priorities for Green Diversification of Oil and Gas Companies

“…The crisis in the fossil fuel market and the shifts in energy transition challenge the long-term sustainability of oil and gas corporations; however, they also reveal opportunities for developing new types of activities. The key factors that prompt oil and gas companies to adopt green diversification include the following [61][62][63][64]:…”

Financial Performance and Market Trends in the Global Financial Services Company Goldman Sachs Group, Inc

“…Ratio analysis, trend analysis, and peer comparison approaches were used to analyze the data. GS's financial performance over the last five years, the key trends that have shaped GS's market performance, the key factors that have driven GS's financial performance and market trends, and the key challenges and opportunities facing GS in the current market environment are among the research questions that have been addressed (Blinova et al, 2023). The report is organized as introduction, financial performance, market trends, performance drivers, problems and opportunities, and conclusion.…”

Sustainable Development and Corporate Sustainability of Chilean State Universities: Evidence from Their Strategic Elements

“…This is because there is little conceptual clarity of corporate sustainability, which creates confusion for its' implementation; furthermore, it generates ineffective and arbitrary practices in complex organizations, such as universities. However, this does not disqualify the importance of corporate sustainability in universities; on the contrary, it reinforces the need to contribute to increasing understanding of corporate sustainability in such organizations [30][31][32][33][34]. There is agreement in the literature that tensions occur when an organization's objectives conflict with the three dimensions of sustainable development, namely ecological, social, and economic [35].…”