Ketidakjujuran Akademik pada Calon Guru Agama

Abstract

The purpose of this study is how the forms of dishonest behavior in situations doing paper work, mid semester exam and final exam of the semester and describe the purpose of behaving dishonestly. Participants in this study are 29 students of 4th semester of Islamic studies education program at university x in Purwokerto. This research uses qualitative method with vignette open questionnaire data retrieval tool known as method to reveal values in individual and data analysis using content analysis. Based on the results of this study revealed that the task situation is the most used situation by students to do academic dishonesty. Academic forms of academic dishonesty work on paper assignments, mid semester exam and final semester exam is asking / asking answers, cheating / looking at friends' answers, quoting blogs, copying paste, copying answers, opening small papers. While the purpose of academic disagreement on the situation of doing paper assignments, mid semester exam and final exam of the semester that is to be / easy to do, work completed / quickly completed, for friends to teach / get answers, not difficult in doing, accurate answers, good value, -same cackling with friends and borrowing to copy.

Investigating Level of Academic Integrity on High School Students in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0

“…Students or low levels of student academic integrity Schools that implement a religious-based education system should tend to have higher academic integrity than students who attend public schools. This is influenced by fear of violating religious rules and getting sins when committing academic fraud students who attend school religious-based a [33]. But in this study, it turned out to show different results so that faith-based schools do not determine that students have higher academic integrity than public-based schools.…”

A training on the identification of academic dishonesty

“…Beragam bentuk yang dilakukan oleh siswa dalam melakukan ketidakjujuran akademik, diantaranya meminta jawaban, mencontek teman diam-diam, mencari dari internet, memberikan jawaban dan membawa catatan/contekan. sedangkan strategi yang dilakukan oleh siswa dalam bentuk membawa contekan diantaranya dengan menaruhnya dalam kaos kaki, sepatu, diselipkan di alat tulis yang diizinkan dibawa kedalam ruang ujian, saku baju dan saku celana (Herdian, 2017). Sedangkan pada penelitian lain, di lingkungan mahasiswa bentuk ketidakjujuran akademik diantaranya dengan melihat jawaban teman, menyalin jawaban, mencontek, copy paste jawaban teman, mengutip dari blog tanpa menuliskan sumber dan mengcopy paste dari internet (Herdian & Wulandari, 2017).…”

Apakah Demografi Memprediksi Ketidakjujuran Akademik?

“…Beragam investigasi mulai dari jenjang pendidikan, hingga pada faktor yang menyababkan ketidakjujuran akademik terjadi. Pada jenjang pendidikan misalnya, ketidakjujuran akademik telah dilakukan pada pendidikan Sekolah Dasar (Fredrika, 2013), Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Lestari & Asyanti, 2015), Sekolah Menengah Atas (Ungusari, 2015) dan Peguruan Tinggi (Herdian & Wulandari, 2018). Sedangkan penelitian yang mengkaji faktor ketidakjujuran akademik dilakukan oleh banyak penelitian (lihat Handayani & Baridwan, 2013: Nursani & Irianto;2013;Mujahidah;).…”