Ketahanan Pangan Rumah Tangga Tani Perkotaan Dan Perdesaaan Kabupaten Gunungkidul

Abstract

This research is conducted (1) to analyze share offarm householdfood expenditure/or the urban and rural,(2) to analyze the level of urban and rural energy farm household, (3) to analyze the level of household food securityurban and rural farm, (4) to analyze desirable dietary pattern of urban and rural farm household, (5) to understand influencingfactor of score food security farm household. The primary method for this research use descriptive analysis,sampling is done by using simple random method with 25 urban and 25 rural farm household in Gun ungkidu I. The data was analyzed by independent sample t-test and multiplier regression analysis by Ordinary Least Square (OLS).The results showed that (1) the share offarm household food expenditure in urban areas is lower than the share of food expenditure offarm households in rural areas, (2) the adequacy offarm household energy in rural areas is higherthan the farm households in urban area, (3) urban households food secure 20%, vulnerable food 40%, less food 12%, food insecurity 28%, yet rural household food secure 16%, vulnerable food 48%, less food 4%, food insecurity 32%,(4) food pattern expectations farm households in urban areas are not higher than the expectation of food patterns in rural areas, (5) factors that positively affect the food security of farm households are farm household income andlocation (urban and rural).

Factors Affecting The Food Security of The Bajo Community Households In West Muna District During The Covid-19 Pandemic

“…This significant value is greater than = 0.1, meaning that the variable price of eggs has no significant effect on the household food security of the Bajo community in Napano Kusambi Sub District, West Muna District. This is in line with the research of Widyanitha, (2015), which states that the results of the logistic regression test calculations on the egg price variable have no effect on the food security of urban and rural farm households.…”

“…The number of family members has a negative effect, where the number of family members decreases food security because more household members are considered to increase the burden on the family in meeting food needs (Pratiwi, 2018). This is in line with research which states that the results of the logistic regression test calculations on the variable number of household members do not have an effect on the food security of urban and rural farm households (Widyanitha, Hardyastuti, & Mulyono, 2015). The results of this study are different from the research which states that the variable number of family members has a significant effect on the household food expenditure of farmers (Suhadini, Yunus, & Zani, 2019).…”

“…This is in line with the results of Delly, (2018) which states that there is no effect of the variable price of rice on the level of household food security of fishermen. Likewise, Widyanitha, (2015) which states that the results of the logistic regression test calculations on the rice price variable do not have an effect on the food security of urban and rural farm households. The results of this study are in line with the research which states that the results of the regression analysis on the rice price variable do not affect the level of household food security of farmers.…”

“…Likewise, Widyanitha, (2015), which states that the income variable has a significant (positive) effect on farm household food security, which shows that the higher one's income, the smaller the share of household expenditure will be. The share of food expenditure has an inverse relationship with the level of food security.…”

Livelihood Vulnerability due to Climate Change: Differences in Smallholder Farmers in Rural and Semi-urban Areas

“…Furthermore, considering that food production also determines the price of food products at the producer level, it can also be said that the impact will also be felt on the welfare of farmers in general and farmers' income in particular. In other words, the vulnerability of the community does not only cover the fulfillment of food needs but more broadly also includes their livelihoods (Widada et al, 2014).…”