Kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa melalui model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning

Sadieda, Lisanul Uswah

doi:10.21831/pg.v14i1.24038

Cited by 9 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Argumentasi merupakan kemampuan siswa dalam hal memberikan pendapat berdasarkan fakta dan alasan yang rasional sesuai realitas. Fungsi argumentasi bagi siswa adalah mendukung kemampuan menulis dan berbicara bagi siswa sehingga memudahkan pemahaman materi dan konsep yang diberikan oleh guru disekolah (Sadieda, 2019).…”

Section: Hasilunclassified

Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMK

Kurniawan

Hidayah

Rahman

2021

Jur.Pend.Teo.Pen.Peng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract: The ability to think critically is an urgent need in the 21st century Vocational School education system. Critical thinking is the individual's ability to seek, receive and manage information from various sources. Media used to make decisions and solve problems based on rationality and accountable reality. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The purpose of this study was to provide a description of the critical thinking skills of SMK students. The research subjects were 254 students of SMK Cendika Bangsa Malang Regency. The inventory of critical thinking skills was adopted from the Watson Glacier Critical Thinking Test (WGCT) critical thinking ability inventory. Analysis of student responses is categorized based on five components of critical thinking, namely assumptions, arguments, deductions, interpretations and conclusions. The results showed that the condition of critical thinking skills of vocational students was low. This condition supports the fact that the critical thinking skills of SMK students are an urgent need that is important to be met by increasing the critical thinking skills of SMK students.Abstrak: Kemampuan berpikir kritis menjadi urgensi kebutuhan dalam sistem pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan abad 21. Berpikir kritis adalah kemampuan individu dalam mencari, menerima, dan mengelola informasi dari berbagai sumber. Media yang digunakan untuk mengambil keputusan dan penyelesaian masalah berdasarkan rasionalitas dan realitas yang bersifat akuntabel. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskrptif kualitatif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memberikan deskripsi kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMK. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa SMK Cendika Bangsa Kabupaten Malang yang berjumlah 254 siswa. Inventori kemampuan berpikir kritis diadopsi dari inventori kemampuan berpkir kritis Watson Gletser Critical Thinking Test (WGCT). Analisis respons siswa dikategorikan berdasarkan lima komponen berpikir kritis, yaitu asumsi, argumentasi, deduksi, interpretasi, dan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kondisi kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMK tergolong rendah. Kondisi tersebut mendukung fakta bahwa kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMK menjadi urgensi kebutuhan yang penting untuk dipenuhi dengan cara meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMK.

show abstract

Section: Hasilunclassified

Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMK

Kurniawan

Hidayah

Rahman

2021

Jur.Pend.Teo.Pen.Peng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mathematicians are reluctant to accept statements without supporting evidence because the evidence confirms the truth of mathematical statements (Sadieda, 2019). The development of evidence and argumentation aims to convince oneself and others about the statement's truth.…”

Section: A Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Zhen et al (2016), providing evidence is also a form of explanation to facilitate other people's understanding of the truth of a statement. Therefore, strong argumentation skills have an important impact on the preparation of mathematical proof (Sadieda, 2019).…”

Section: A Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of Differentiate Student Worksheets: an Efforts to Improve Student Argumentation Ability

Putra,

Rahardi,

Sisworo

2024

JTAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Online learning experiences have been associated with reduced learning outcomes and limited student engagement in argumentation. To address this issue, the focus on teaching materials becomes crucial, especially in promoting differentiated learning to accommodate pandemic-induced learning losses. A prime candidate for enhancing argumentation skills is the study of quadrilaterals within mathematics. Mastering the quadrilateral concept and its argumentative structure is pivotal for students. Hence, the creation of student worksheets employing differentiated learning principles is imperative. This research aims to develop valid, practical, and effective quadrilateral worksheets with a focus on adversity quotient differentiation. The ADDIE model guides the development process through Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation stages. Rigorous evaluation, including expert validation (83.8% very valid), field trials (91% very practical), and N-Gain score analysis (0.73, indicating effectiveness), underscores the quality of the developed worksheets. In conclusion, the adversity quotient differentiated quadrilateral worksheets has been successfully crafted to enhance students' argumentation skills. It is deemed valid, practical, and effective in improving learning outcomes. This initiative holds potential for addressing the challenges posed by online learning and contributes to students' academic development.

show abstract

“…Argumentation structure models that can be used as a reference include the model according to Toulmin and the model according to Mc. Neill and Krajcik (Sadieda, 2019). However, this research focuses on the Toulmin model, because the Toulmin model is considered a model with complete structural components (Suartha et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model

Ramandani,

Hartono,

Hiltrimartin

et al. 2024

J. Elemen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Geometric argumentation has an important role in solving mathematical problems in geometric material, so students must have this ability. Each student has different thoughts, including when stating arguments. Each student's arguments will vary and be at different levels. This study aims to determine the levels of lower secondary school students' geometric argumentation. This research was conducted in a lower secondary school involving 20 ninth-grade students. Students participating in this study were asked to work on geometry problems related to proof. Through the proofs carried out, the argumentation structure owned by students is visible. The structures of argumentation given by the students were then analysed using Toulmin's model of argumentation. The components of the Toulmin model used consist of claim, data, warrant, and backing. The results of the analysis of the proof prepared by the students stated that some of the students have been able to reach a high level of geometric argumentation and can compile a series of proofs. But not a few of them also have difficulty compiling the proof, have difficulty providing the components of the Toulmin model, and make some mistakes. Errors made by students include symbol writing errors, calculation errors, and others.

show abstract

Kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa melalui model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning

Cited by 9 publications

References 5 publications

Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMK

Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMK

Development of Differentiate Student Worksheets: an Efforts to Improve Student Argumentation Ability

Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About