1994
DOI: 10.1080/00087114.1994.10797311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotypes of four species of South America natives and one cultivated species ofLathyrusL.

Abstract: SUMMARY -Karyotypes of four species of South America natives, Lathyrus pubescens, L. macrostachys, L. neroosus, L. crassipes and one cultivated species L. odoratus, are described. All species have 2n = 14 chromosomes. Differences were seen among species in some aspects: in the metacentric, submetacentric and subtelocentric chromosomes numbers, in the numbers and positions of secondary constrictions, in the size of chromosomes and in the total size of complement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
25
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the interspecific level, within section Lathyrus and Cicercula, some species can be distinguished clearly by their karyotype formulae, and when quantitative karyotype data are added, the majority of entities can be differentiated. The constancy in chromosome number observed in the species studied here and in those cited in the literature (Senn 1938, Battistin and Fernández 1994, Klamt and Schifino-Wittmann 2000, Seijo and Fernández 2003 indicates that numerical changes have not been important in the evolution of South American species, as noted for most of the entities of Lathyrus (Hitchcock 1952, Yamamoto et al 1984, Sahin et al 2000. However, this constancy differs from the situation described for North America, where several endemic polyploid species were found, so that North America was considered as a center of polyploid origin for Lathyrus (Broich 1989).…”
Section: Schifino-wittmann 2000)mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the interspecific level, within section Lathyrus and Cicercula, some species can be distinguished clearly by their karyotype formulae, and when quantitative karyotype data are added, the majority of entities can be differentiated. The constancy in chromosome number observed in the species studied here and in those cited in the literature (Senn 1938, Battistin and Fernández 1994, Klamt and Schifino-Wittmann 2000, Seijo and Fernández 2003 indicates that numerical changes have not been important in the evolution of South American species, as noted for most of the entities of Lathyrus (Hitchcock 1952, Yamamoto et al 1984, Sahin et al 2000. However, this constancy differs from the situation described for North America, where several endemic polyploid species were found, so that North America was considered as a center of polyploid origin for Lathyrus (Broich 1989).…”
Section: Schifino-wittmann 2000)mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…᭡ϭSection Lathyrus; ϭsection: Clymenum, ᭹ϭSection Aphaca, ᭺ϭSection Cicercula. tulated (Narayan andDurrant 1983, Klamt andSchifino-Wittmann 2000) and that entities may be characterized by their chromosome features as was suggested by other authors (Yamamoto et al 1984, Murray et al 1992a, Battistin and Fernández 1994. In relation to the genome size variation, there are differences in the chromosome length among the studied taxa.…”
Section: Schifino-wittmann 2000)mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors claim that, in addition to the numerical chromosome constancy, species display uniformity in chromosome morphology (all chromosomes are metacentric or submetacentric). However, others have found enough interspecific karyotype differences to allow species characterization (Yamamoto et al 1984, Murray et al 1992, Battistin and Fernández 1994. Such discrepancy was also observed at the infraspecific level, mainly in the widely studied L. odoratus L. and L. sativus L. (Bhattacharjee 1954, Sharma and Datta 1959, Verma and Ohri 1979, Murray et al 1992.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…All species have 2n = 2x = 14 chromosomes, with the basic number being n = x = 7. Although there is no variation in chromosome number, there are variations in chromosome size, in centromere location, and in the number, size and location of secondary constrictions (Sharma and Datta, 1959;Roy and Singh, 1967;Federov, 1969;Fouzard and Tandon, 1975;Broich, 1989;Battistin and Fernández, 1994), and in DNA content, involving euchromatin and heterochromatin, as well as repetitive and non-repetitive DNA sequences (Lavania and Sharma, 1980;Narayan and Durrant, 1983;Kuryan and Narayan, 1987;Murray et al, 1992). Another important variation observed in these species is in the number and location of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) (Nazeer et al, 1982;Murray et al, 1992;Battistin and Fernández, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%