“Kampung Literasi ITS” sebagai Model Pengembangan Literasi di TBM

Savitri, Eka Dian; Nuswantara, Kartika; Hermanto, Hermanto; Rai, Ni Gusti Made; Bhawika, Gita Widi; Qomariyah, Astutik Nur

doi:10.12962/j26139960.v2i2.4498

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Gamal is a source of forage which is high in protein. Gamal contains 24-25% crude protein [2]. In the Bangka Belitung Islands, Gamal is deliberately cultivated as a climbing pole and shade for pepper plants.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response of young Bali bulls given Gliricidia and Cassava leaves in rations as a substitute for grass in Bangka Belitung

Hidayat¹,

Nuraini²,

Rubiyo³

et al. 2021

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gliricidia (Gamal) is a high protein forage source. Gamal contains 24-25% crude protein. In Bangka Belitung Islands, Gamal is deliberately cultivated as a climbing pole and shade for pepper plants. Usually, Gamal shoots are trimmed once every three months, the leaves can be used as feed. Apart from Gamal, Cassava leaves are also a nutritious feed ingredient. Cassava leaves contain 23.04% crude protein, 24.86% dry matter, and 64.87% dry matter digestibility. This study aims to determine feed consumption, body weight gain, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) of young Bali bulls into small farmers. This research was conducted in Simpang Perlang Village, Central Bangka Regency from June to October 2016. The sample used was 24 young Bali bulls aged 1-3 years with an average live weight of 186.3 kg, which were grouped into 4 (four) feed treatments and 2 (two) age groups, namely 1-2 years and 2-3 years, where each was given 3 (three) replications. Data was analyzed using a completely randomized design and the DMRT test. The results showed that the feed factor and age factor significantly (P < 0.05) had an effect on feed consumption, body weight gain, and FCR.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response of young Bali bulls given Gliricidia and Cassava leaves in rations as a substitute for grass in Bangka Belitung

Hidayat¹,

Nuraini²,

Rubiyo³

et al. 2021

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Perbandingan Implementasi Smart City di Indonesia: Studi Kasus: Perbandingan Smart People di Kota Surabaya dan Kota Malang

Pramesti

Kasiwi

Purnomo

2020

IJD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study focuses on the problem of smart people as an indicator of the success of smart cities in Surabaya and Malang. Smart people are one of the supporting dimensions of the creation of a smart city or what is called a Smart City (Zubizarreta, Seravalli, And, Arrizabalaga, 2016). So that the factors that make a city smart, one of which is measured by the quality of its human resources; which includes the human development index which is measured by how the level of unemployment, poverty level, health problems, and also seen from the aspect of public knowledge in receiving information, disseminating information, related to the development of creativity carried out and also the inclusiveness of empowering activities carried out by several people. (Iyer, 2018). In addition, the activities that are encountered in the city of Surabaya in community activities, already have quite innovative and creative networks. Meanwhile, Malang City is still heading for the stage of good quality. There needs to be motivation and encouragement so that Malang City is able to follow in the footsteps of the development of smart people in the city of Surabaya.Penelitian ini berfokus pada masalah smart people sebagai indicator keberhasilan smart city di Kota Surabaya dan Kota Malang. Smart people merupakan salah satu dimensi pendukung dari terwujudnya kota pintar atau yang disebut dengan Smart City (Zubizarreta, Seravalli, And, Arrizabalaga, 2016). Sehingga faktor-faktor yang menjadikan sebuah kota dapat dikatakan pintar salah satunya diukur dari kualitas sumber daya manusianya; yang meliputi dari indeks pembangunan manusianya yang diukur dari bagaimana tingkat pengamgguran, tingkat kemiskinan, masalah kesehatan, dan juga dilihat dari aspek pengetahuan masyarakat di dalam menerima informasi, menyebarkan informasi, terkait dengan penumbuhan kratifitas yang dilakukan dan juga inklusivitas pemberdayaan kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh beberapa orang (Iyer, 2018). Selain itu, aktifitas yang ditemui di Kota Surabaya dalam kegiatan komunitasnya, sudah memiliki jaringan yang cukup inovatif dan juga kreatif. Sedangkan untuk di Kota Malang masih menuju tahapan kualitas yang baik. Perlu adanya motivasi dan dorongan supaya Kota Malang mampu mengikuti jejak perkembangan smart people yang ada di Kota Surabaya.

show abstract

“Kampung Literasi ITS” sebagai Model Pengembangan Literasi di TBM

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

Response of young Bali bulls given Gliricidia and Cassava leaves in rations as a substitute for grass in Bangka Belitung

Response of young Bali bulls given Gliricidia and Cassava leaves in rations as a substitute for grass in Bangka Belitung

Perbandingan Implementasi Smart City di Indonesia: Studi Kasus: Perbandingan Smart People di Kota Surabaya dan Kota Malang

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About