2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2005.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K X-ray production by 12C4+ ion impact on selected elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the latter are shown in figure 6. Comparing our data with previous ones on Fe [7,13] in the case of C (figure 7), we observe consistency with those of Fazinic et al [7], assuming similar statistical errors, but large discrepancies with those of de Lucio et al [13], increasing with energy. Furthermore, Fazinic data and ours closely follow the trend marked by the theory.…”
Section: -Differential Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only the latter are shown in figure 6. Comparing our data with previous ones on Fe [7,13] in the case of C (figure 7), we observe consistency with those of Fazinic et al [7], assuming similar statistical errors, but large discrepancies with those of de Lucio et al [13], increasing with energy. Furthermore, Fazinic data and ours closely follow the trend marked by the theory.…”
Section: -Differential Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…(2) for the targets and in the cases that it was applied to. Total cross section for K X-ray production induced by C ions on Fe, compared to the results of references [7] and [13] and with the ECPSSR and ECPSSR-UA theories [21].…”
Section: -Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1-5. We presented results corresponding to five target elements, each one representing one element subgroup (Z 2 = 6 from the subgroup [4][5][6][7][8][9][10], Z 2 = 29 from the subgroup [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], Z 2 = 39 from the subgroup [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], Z 2 = 51 from the subgroup [41-60] and Z 2 = 73 from the subgroup [61-92]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical, analytical and semi-empirical approaches for calculation of K-shell ionisation were derived from those cited models by applying various corrections taking into consideration multiple physical effects such as binding, polarisation, relativistic and deflection effects [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Existing Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%