2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K−N amplitudes below threshold constrained by multinucleon absorption

Abstract: Six widely different subthreshold K − N scattering amplitudes obtained in SU(3) chiral-model EFT approaches by fitting to low-energy and threshold data are employed in optical-potential studies of kaonic atoms. Phenomenological terms representing K − multinucleon interactions are added to the EFT-inspired single-nucleon part of the K − -nucleus optical potential in order to obtain good fits to kaonic-atom strong-interaction level shifts and widths across the periodic table. Introducing as a further constraint … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
123
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding energies B K − exhibit the same A dependence in all models considered, however, their magnitudes are strongly model dependent. It is due to the different depths of ReV (1) K − predicted by the K − N interaction models. The K − N conversion widths are rather small and weakly A-dependent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The binding energies B K − exhibit the same A dependence in all models considered, however, their magnitudes are strongly model dependent. It is due to the different depths of ReV (1) K − predicted by the K − N interaction models. The K − N conversion widths are rather small and weakly A-dependent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of the phenomenological potential, complex amplitude B and positive exponent α, were recently fitted by Friedman and Gal [1] to kaonic atom data for each chirally-motivated meson-baryon interaction model considered in this work separately. Moreover, the total…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations