2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.psfr.2013.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Juger la recrutabilité des candidats : quels effets de l’apparence et des aptitudes en fonction des types de postes ?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perceivers make an inference about the congruence between the types of actions people engage in and their gender role (Desrumaux & Pohl, 2014). The ability to predict from role identity to performance is higher for those with more committed identities (Stryker & Burke, 2000).…”
Section: Transactional and Transformational Leadership And Gender Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Perceivers make an inference about the congruence between the types of actions people engage in and their gender role (Desrumaux & Pohl, 2014). The ability to predict from role identity to performance is higher for those with more committed identities (Stryker & Burke, 2000).…”
Section: Transactional and Transformational Leadership And Gender Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to role congruity theory (Eagly, 1987), it is the incongruity between stereotypes of women and the stereotype of leaders that produces bias evaluation (Heilman, 2012). The lackof-fit model suggests that an individual whose role is unreliable with the traits ascribed to him/her is discriminated against because of the perceived lack of fit, producing increased beliefs of failure and decreased beliefs of success (Desrumaux & Pohl, 2014;Eagly & Diekman, 2005). The incongruity between feminine gender identity and group focused transformational leaders and transactional leadership is one type of lack of fit.…”
Section: Leadership Self-efficacy As a Mediatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation