2019
DOI: 10.1590/2318-0331.241920180066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint calibration of a hydrological model and rating curve parameters for simulation of flash flood in urban areas

Abstract: Calibration process is usually time demanding and as much streamflow information as possible in rainfall-runoff models. Nevertheless, from a practical point of view, the available information is measurement of water level, which is essential to design rating curves. This manuscript proposes a set of joint calibration of hydrological model parameters with a range of rating curves, developed for the main channel of the catchment in a crowded urban area. As an alternative of free calibration, the simulations were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach uses satellite data to infer both the discharge data used for model calibration and the reservoir operations included in the hydrological model. Unlike previous studies, our approach uses global sensitivity analysis to avoid the biases that could be introduced when co-calibrating the hydrological model and the rating curve used to reconstruct the discharge data (Lima et al, 2019). This fundamental step also helps us narrow down the uncertainty range for the parameterization of the rating curve in a more justified way.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach uses satellite data to infer both the discharge data used for model calibration and the reservoir operations included in the hydrological model. Unlike previous studies, our approach uses global sensitivity analysis to avoid the biases that could be introduced when co-calibrating the hydrological model and the rating curve used to reconstruct the discharge data (Lima et al, 2019). This fundamental step also helps us narrow down the uncertainty range for the parameterization of the rating curve in a more justified way.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b) is to calibrate both models concurrently (e.g., Liu et al, 2015;Sun et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2020). Here, a potential pitfall is the fact that estimation errors in the hydraulic model (discharge estimation) may be compensated for by introducing parameter biases in the hydrological model, and vice versa (Lima et al, 2019). In other words, simultaneous calibration of the hydraulic and hydrological models may yield biased parameters, ultimately compromising the realism and reliability of the calibrated models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined use of hydrological and hydraulic models, together with the forecasting of meteorological systems, is a study aspect that has been widely applied in the analysis of extreme events in urban environments. [24][25][26] From the results and analysis of the flood studies, it is possible to reduce the damage caused by these events. Therefore, these analyses make it possible to forecast disasters and implement an alert system for the population, so that everyone is informed about the best way to act in the face of these events.…”
Section: Introduction Floods In Urban Centresmentioning
confidence: 99%