2021
DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-59.5.405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job Interview and Vocational Outcomes Among Transition-Age Youth Receiving Special Education Pre-Employment Transition Services

Abstract: Vocational outcomes among transition-age youth receiving special education services are critically poor and have only incrementally improved since the implementation of the Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act. Few studies highlight whether interviewing may be critical to obtaining vocational outcomes such as competitive employment or internships. This study evaluated vocational interviewing and outcomes among 656 transition-age youth receiving special education pre-employment transition services from 47 schoo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Job interviewing is one of many pre-employment transition skills identified by the U.S. Department of Education (2017), and 88.8% of employed youth with disabilities receiving state-supported Pre-ETS completed interviews to get their jobs (M. J. Smith, Sherwood, Blajeski, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Job interviewing is one of many pre-employment transition skills identified by the U.S. Department of Education (2017), and 88.8% of employed youth with disabilities receiving state-supported Pre-ETS completed interviews to get their jobs (M. J. Smith, Sherwood, Blajeski, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D. Smith, Berkel, Jordan, et al, 2018). Finally, we adapted the student-level acceptability and usability measures from our evaluation of VR-JIT to assess VIT-TAY (M. J. Smith, Smith, et al, 2021) and rescaled them for equivalence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations