2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jets in magnetically arrested hot accretion flows: geometry, power, and black hole spin-down

Abstract: We present the results of nine simulations of radiatively-inefficient magnetically arrested disks (MADs) across different values of the black hole spin parameter a*: −0.9, −0.7, −0.5, −0.3, 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9. Each simulation was run up to t ≳ 100 000 GM/c3 to ensure disk inflow equilibrium out to large radii. We find that the saturated magnetic flux level, and consequently also jet power, of MAD disks depends strongly on the black hole spin, confirming previous results. Prograde disks saturate at a muc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
105
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
17
105
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The final BH masses be taken as an upper limit. We note that the accretion is a highly uncertain process and represents an active field of study (e.g., Blandford & Begelman 1999;Park & Ostriker 2001;Igumenshchev et al 2003;Narayan et al 2003;Ohsuga et al 2005;Yuan et al 2012;Jiang et al 2014;McKinney et al 2014;Narayan et al 2022). To assess the limits of our model, we also consider a physically motivated accretion model, momentum-driven winds (Section 2.5).…”
Section: Discussion and Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The final BH masses be taken as an upper limit. We note that the accretion is a highly uncertain process and represents an active field of study (e.g., Blandford & Begelman 1999;Park & Ostriker 2001;Igumenshchev et al 2003;Narayan et al 2003;Ohsuga et al 2005;Yuan et al 2012;Jiang et al 2014;McKinney et al 2014;Narayan et al 2022). To assess the limits of our model, we also consider a physically motivated accretion model, momentum-driven winds (Section 2.5).…”
Section: Discussion and Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the ΔM calculated in this proof-of-concept study assumes that the BH accretes all of the material that it captures. Estimating the true fraction of the material accreted by the BH is very challenging; this complex problem requires numerically solving the generalized general relativistic fluid equations with cooling, heating, and radiative transfer, etc., and remains an active field of research (e.g., Blandford & Begelman 1999;Park & Ostriker 2001;Igumenshchev et al 2003;Narayan et al 2003;Ohsuga et al 2005;Yuan et al 2012;Jiang et al 2014;McKinney et al 2014;Narayan et al 2022). Heuristically, if a collision between a BH and a star results in an accretion disk, the disk's viscous timescale may be as short as days.…”
Section: Uncertainties In Accretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulations were run for 100,000 GM/c 3 to study the effects of long-timescale trends. They form model set "C" and have been studied in Narayan et al (2022).…”
Section: Koralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate the effect of Γ ad on light-curve variability by comparing M 3 for thermal, GRMHD simulations with varying Γ ad . This includes MAD models with Γ ad = 13/9 (see Section B.2 and Narayan et al 2022) and SANE models with Γ ad = 5/3. The models exhibit light-curve variability similar to the fiducial models, and all have M 3 distributions that are inconsistent with the historical data.…”
Section: B5 Effect Of Fluid Adiabatic Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%