2022
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Testing Astrophysical Models of the Galactic Center Black Hole

Abstract: In this paper we provide a first physical interpretation for the Event Horizon Telescope's (EHT) 2017 observations of Sgr A*. Our main approach is to compare resolved EHT data at 230 GHz and unresolved non-EHT observations from radio to X-ray wavelengths to predictions from a library of models based on time-dependent general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics simulations, including aligned, tilted, and stellar-wind-fed simulations; radiative transfer is performed assuming both thermal and nonthermal electron di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the short dynamical timescale ∼ 20 s, the EHT has pushed VLBI techniques to image the dynamical evolution of Sgr A by reconstructing the source's emission region [18,19]. Assuming General Relativity, the estimated dynamical mass and distance are consistent with the angular diameter of the shadow (51.8 ± 2.3) µas recently reported by the EHT collaboration [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the short dynamical timescale ∼ 20 s, the EHT has pushed VLBI techniques to image the dynamical evolution of Sgr A by reconstructing the source's emission region [18,19]. Assuming General Relativity, the estimated dynamical mass and distance are consistent with the angular diameter of the shadow (51.8 ± 2.3) µas recently reported by the EHT collaboration [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Consensus is currently lacking regarding the spin and observer inclination angle of Sgr A , with different analyses returning differing constraints. For instance, the EHT observations of Sgr A are consistent with a large spin and low inclination angle [20,24], but are very far from ruling out the antipodal region of parameter space. Earlier work based on quasi-periodic oscillations of emissions in radio, infrared, and X-rays [195] or millimeter VLBI [196,197], exclude an extremal spin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, and perhaps most importantly, there is no clear consensus on the value of SgrA * 's spin and inclination angle. The EHT images are in principle consistent with large spin and low inclination angle, but are far from being inconsistent with low spin and large inclination angle [11,15]. Independent works based on radio, infrared, and X-ray emission, as well as millimeter VLBI, exclude extremal spin (1 − a 1), but have been unable to place strong constraints otherwise [149][150][151] constraints across a wide range of spin values [152,153].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Horizon-scale images of supermassive black holes and their shadows have opened a new unparalleled window onto tests of gravity and fundamental physics in the very strong-field regime, including the possibility that astrophysical BHs may be described by alternatives to the Kerr metric. In this work, we have used the horizonscale images of SgrA * provided by the Event Horizon Telescope [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] to test some of the most popular and well-motivated scenarios deviating from the Kerr metric. Compared to horizon-scale images of M87 * , there are significant advantages in the use of images of SgrA * , as we discussed towards the end of Sec.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation