The images of the supermassive black holes Sgr A* and M87* by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) collaboration mark a special milestone in the history of the subject. For the first time we are able to see the shadow of black holes, testing basic predictions of the theory of general relativity. We are also now learning more about the fundamental astrophysical processes close to the event horizon that help to shape entire galaxies and even parts of our cosmos. The ultimate result was only possible due to a large collaborative effort of scientists and institutions around the world. The road towards these images was the result of a long sociological and scientific process. It started with early pathfinder experiments and a few simple ideas that were remarkably successful in predicting the basic observational signatures to look for. This was based on the premise that black holes are inherently simple objects. Here I describe this journey and some lessons learned from a personal perspective.
IntroImaging a black hole does not just happen. It is a result of a long scientific but also sociological process: pioneering work of a few and the collective effort of many, understanding the basic physics, long term visions, sudden revelations, technological game changers, continuously growing incremental insights, and in the end also some luck. Witnessing how such a process unfolds from the beginning was an interesting experience for me. Here, I try to tell the story from my personal perspective and mention a few of the lessons I learned along the way. This is not meant as an exhaustive and thorough scientific review of the topic, but uses a more narrative approach. An extensive and more popular description of the process and science can be found in our book "Light in the darkness" (Falcke and Römer 2021).Looking back at my career it pays off to let yourself be guided by the big scientific picture first. As a student, I was drawn into physics by the fundamental questions about space, time, and matter that it addressed. Particle physics was at its peak and I was impressed by the large physics collaborations and the success of the standard model to rule our world view. However, it was also clear that particle physics was getting too big. The ability to make an impact was getting more difficult and the next big thing was perhaps decades away.There was still one major unsolved question: What is the true nature of gravity -after all, it was the last force resisting assimilation into the standard model of physics. Was it a force at all? How would it relate to quantum physics? One of the most mysterious objects that encapsulated all these questions seemed to be black holes. Did they really exist in nature?Black holes: from mathematical curiosity to astrophysical paradigm Soon after Einstein developed his theory of general relativity (GR), black holes became the first solution of his field equations. In the trenches of World War I, Karl Schwarzschild (1916) calculated how spacetime would be curved around a point mass. Everybody understoo...