2022
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Formation of Intermediate-mass Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei

Abstract: Most stellar evolution models predict that black holes (BHs) should not exist above approximately 50–70 M ⊙, the lower limit of the pair-instability mass gap. However, recent LIGO/Virgo detections indicate the existence of BHs with masses at and above this threshold. We suggest that massive BHs, including intermediate-mass BHs (IMBHs), can form in galactic nuclei through collisions between stellar-mass BHs and the surrounding main-sequence stars. Considering dynamical processes such as collis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from their intrinsic interest as electromagnetic transient sources, close encounters between black holes and stars may have an important effect on the overall demographics of black holes in clusters. If a significant fraction of the disrupted stellar material is accreted by the black hole, these TDEs may lead to significant black hole mass growth, potentially enabling formation of black holes within or above the pair-instability mass gap (e.g., Giersz et al 2015;Arca-Sedda et al 2021;Rizzuto et al 2022;Rose et al 2022). Furthermore, if a star is disrupted by a binary black hole, the disrupted material may alter the spin magnitude and orientation of the binary black hole components (e.g., Lopez & Batta 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from their intrinsic interest as electromagnetic transient sources, close encounters between black holes and stars may have an important effect on the overall demographics of black holes in clusters. If a significant fraction of the disrupted stellar material is accreted by the black hole, these TDEs may lead to significant black hole mass growth, potentially enabling formation of black holes within or above the pair-instability mass gap (e.g., Giersz et al 2015;Arca-Sedda et al 2021;Rizzuto et al 2022;Rose et al 2022). Furthermore, if a star is disrupted by a binary black hole, the disrupted material may alter the spin magnitude and orientation of the binary black hole components (e.g., Lopez & Batta 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These black holes can inspiral towards the central SMBH after their cluster gets disrupted by tides (37,39), and it is predicted to result in SMBH-IMBH merger rates of 10 −4 -10 −3 Gpc −3 yr −1 in the local Universe (40). IMBHs with masses ∼10 3−4 M ⊙ can also be retained in NSCs as a result of repeated stellar mass black hole-stellar-mass black hole or stellar-mass black hole-star mergers (41,42).…”
Section: Perturber-induced Outflow Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• a series of mergers of stellar black holes (41) or stellar black holes with other stars in the NSC (42).…”
Section: Formation Channels For Imbhs and Imbh-smbh Pair Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMBHs with masses in between these two extremes can be produced at any redshift through repeated mergers either of massive mainsequence stars, later collapsing to form a BH (Portegies Zwart & McMillan 2002;Gürkan et al 2004;Freitag et al 2006;Pan et al 2012;Giersz et al 2015;Tagawa et al 2020;Das et al 2021;Di Carlo et al 2021), or of stellar-mass BHs (Miller & Hamilton 2002;O'Leary et al 2006;Antonini & Rasio 2016;Antonini et al 2019;González et al 2021;Mapelli et al 2021;Weatherford et al 2021;Fragione et al 2022). Other possibilities include the fragmentation of active galactic nucleus (AGN) disks (McKernan et al 2012(McKernan et al , 2014, super-Eddington accretion onto stellar BHs embedded in AGN disks (e.g., Kocsis et al 2011), and repeated mergers of BHs with stars in galactic nuclei (e.g., Stone et al 2017;Rose et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%