1984
DOI: 10.1016/0160-2896(84)90020-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jensen's reaction-time investigations of intelligence: A critique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They received 10€ as payment for their participation and could indicate whether they wanted to be informed about their personal results. (Longstreth, 1984) and in order to ensure compatibility of this paradigm with EEG measurements, we adopted the modified Hick paradigm developed by Neubauer, Bauer, and Höller (1992). This modified paradigm is presented on a computer screen and does not employ a home button.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They received 10€ as payment for their participation and could indicate whether they wanted to be informed about their personal results. (Longstreth, 1984) and in order to ensure compatibility of this paradigm with EEG measurements, we adopted the modified Hick paradigm developed by Neubauer, Bauer, and Höller (1992). This modified paradigm is presented on a computer screen and does not employ a home button.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this basic-information-processing view, it is assumed that the speed of information processing (RT) or the speed of information intake (IT) is a central limiting factor of information processing. However, the interpretation of the correlations between elementary tasks and higher order intelligence in terms of causality has also frequently been questioned (Bors, MacLeod, & Forrin, 1993;Detterman, 1987;Longstreth, 1984), leaving the debate for the most part inconclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Por exemplo, sugeria-se que tais coefi cientes oscilavam consoante a aplicação dos testes de inteligência era feita com ou sem limites de tempo (Carroll, 1981;Schwartz, Griffi n & Brown, 1983;Vigneau, Blanchet, Loranger & Pépin, 2002) ou consoante se controlava ou não o efeito da prática acumulada ao longo do experimento (Longstreth, 1984;Longstreth, Walsh, Alcorn & Szzeeszulski, 1986). Respondendo a estas críticas, Vernon, Nador e Kantor (1985) verifi caram que as correlações se mantinham independentemente das condições (com e sem limites de tempo) em que eram aplicados os testes de inteligência.…”
Section: S Ribeiro E L S Almeidaunclassified