1974
DOI: 10.2307/2334363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jackknife Estimation of Functions of Stratum Means

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Biometrika Trust is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Biometrika. SUMMARYThe jackknife method of investigating and reducing the bias in nonli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard errors for survey estimates of totals were produced using the Ultimate Cluster Variance estimation technique (Wolter 1985). Standard errors for estimates of odds ratios and proportions were calculated using a modified form of the Jack knife variance estimation technique (Jones 1974). Standard chi-square tests and chi-square tests for trend adjusted for the complex sample design were used to assess the difference between categorical SES indicators and dichotomised health outcome variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard errors for survey estimates of totals were produced using the Ultimate Cluster Variance estimation technique (Wolter 1985). Standard errors for estimates of odds ratios and proportions were calculated using a modified form of the Jack knife variance estimation technique (Jones 1974). Standard chi-square tests and chi-square tests for trend adjusted for the complex sample design were used to assess the difference between categorical SES indicators and dichotomised health outcome variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expansion (9) The derivations of E ( B y ) ) , E(Bi2'), and E(By') can be justified under conditions similar to (8). Since (5b) is not needed in the preceding derivation, the bias reduction result of @) holds true for bounded and unbounded L. Jones (1974) gave a similar result on B ( g y ) ) , but without the precise order, as in (14).…”
Section: Jackknife Estimators Ofmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…(1) Jones (1974) proposed the following estimator: 8y) = (n f 1 -L)8 -2 (nh -1)ah, n = nh. For nh = 2, g:' ) was considered in McCarthy (1966).…”
Section: Jackknife Estimators Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been discussed widely in the statistical literature, applications of the jackknife procedure in situations with two or more samples have been studied less extensively (e.g. Jones, 1974;Ahmad 1981). For the problem at hand, we follow a definition of the jackknife variance estimator in the two sample situation that was first given by Arvesen (1969).…”
Section: Variance Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%