2012
DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2012.654768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic disparities in physical health among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in Western Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact reasons underlying the inequality in otitis media prevalence between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children are not fully understood, although they are likely to be multifactorial and interrelated. Some risk factors for otitis media that remain common in many Aboriginal families include large numbers of children living in the same household,10 11 recent ear infections among family members,12 13 poor housing quality,14 high nasal pathogen loads15 16 and infant bottle feeding 13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact reasons underlying the inequality in otitis media prevalence between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children are not fully understood, although they are likely to be multifactorial and interrelated. Some risk factors for otitis media that remain common in many Aboriginal families include large numbers of children living in the same household,10 11 recent ear infections among family members,12 13 poor housing quality,14 high nasal pathogen loads15 16 and infant bottle feeding 13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Although asthma prevalence and hospitalisation rate estimates for the general Australian population increase with increasing area-level socio-economic disadvantage, 20 Shepherd et al reported significantly lower odds of ever having asthma among Western Australian Aboriginal children living in more disadvantaged areas. 15 The reasons for these disparate patterns are unclear; however, our results suggest that among children in the SEARCH cohort, the relationship between asthma and socio-economic disadvantage is consistent with that in the general population. The inverse association between asthma and household size inferred in our analyses has also been reported in several previous studies and may be at least partly attributable to an effect of sibling-mediated microbial exposure on post-natal maturation of the immune system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Analyses of cross-sectional data for 5289 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children recruited into the Western Australian Aboriginal Child Health Survey indicated that the odds of asthma decline steeply with increasing geographic isolation and are lower among children living in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas than among children from more advantaged areas; however, no associations were found between asthma and a range of other potential risk factors, including maternal smoking during pregnancy and current carer smoking. 14,15 This paper presents a cross-sectional study of asthma prevalence in a cohort of urban Aboriginal children recruited into the Study of Environment on Aboriginal Resilience and Child Health (SEARCH). Study aims were: (i) to describe socio-demographic patterns of asthma prevalence in the SEARCH cohort; (ii) to quantify the strength of associations between asthma prevalence and both pre-natal maternal smoking and current exposure to carer smoking; and (iii) to compare estimates of associations between asthma prevalence and pre-natal maternal and current carer smoking in the SEARCH cohort with estimates for other populations, derived from meta-analyses of published crosssectional data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We include additional independent variables in the modeling: at the individual level of influence, e.g., proportion of optimal birth weight/gestational age [ 46 , 47 ], cigarette smoking [ 48 ]; at the family level , e.g., parental cigarette smoking [ 19 , 49 ], poor quality housing [ 19 , 50 ]; and at the neighborhood level , e.g., a Census-based measure of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage [ 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%