2017
DOI: 10.5897/err2017.3147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Item response theory: A basic concept

Abstract: With the development in computing technology, item response theory (IRT) develops rapidly, and has become a user friendly application in psychometrics world. Limitation in classical theory is one aspect that encourages the use of IRT. In this study, the basic concept of IRT will be discussed. In addition, it will briefly review the ability parameter estimation, particularly maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and expected a posteriori (EAP). This review aims to describe the fundamental understanding of IRT, ML… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Item response theory (IRT) is a measurement model based on attempts to explain the relationship between latent traits (e.g., level of stress) and their manifestations (derived from responses to items). A graded response model (because this fits best for a questionnaire that uses a Likert scale for the responses (Merino-Soto, Angulo-Ramos, Rovira-Millán, and Rosario-Hernández, 2023)) and a maximum likelihood approach (because it is commonly used and is effective for large sample sizes (Jumailiyah, 2017) were used to fit the IRT models.…”
Section: Item Response Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item response theory (IRT) is a measurement model based on attempts to explain the relationship between latent traits (e.g., level of stress) and their manifestations (derived from responses to items). A graded response model (because this fits best for a questionnaire that uses a Likert scale for the responses (Merino-Soto, Angulo-Ramos, Rovira-Millán, and Rosario-Hernández, 2023)) and a maximum likelihood approach (because it is commonly used and is effective for large sample sizes (Jumailiyah, 2017) were used to fit the IRT models.…”
Section: Item Response Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaptation of activities, especially for closed-ended questions, has been discussed to some extent in the literature (Chrysafiadi, Troussas, & Virvou, 2018). In the case of closed-ended questions, such as those used in most MOOCs, IRT can be an interesting solution to adapt the questions to the level and skills of the students (Cui et al, 2019;Hambleton, Swaminathan, Rogers, 1991;Mahmud, 2017). IRT models can include up to three parameters (Reeve & Fayers, 2005): ( 1) difficulty (the ability a student needs to have to be able to answer correctly a question with a 50% probability); ( 2) discrimination (how good a question is to differentiate between students with an ability higher or lower than the needed to answer that question correctly); and ( 3) guessing (the probability to answer a question correctly by guessing).…”
Section: Adaptive Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTT approaches to measurement rely mainly on correlational techniques like Cronbach's alpha coefficients, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Although CTT approaches have advantages (e.g., require smaller sample sizes, weaker assumptions) and can be effective at creating internally consistent scales, researchers are using IRT approaches to develop psychometrically optimized scales by increasing precision and minimizing measurement error (Foster et al, 2017;Mahmud, 2017).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%