Istilah Kekerabatan Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Minangkabau: Analisis Kontrastif dalam Pemelajaran Bahasa

Zabadi, Fairul

doi:10.22236/imajeri.v3i1.5605

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The total number of source words used in this study is 52. They were drawn from Rusmali et al’s (1985) Minangkabau-Indonesian Dictionary and Burhanuddin and Zabadi’s (2013) Indonesian-Minangkabau Dictionary. The selected source words must meet the following criteria: They must be native Indonesian lexical items; consequently, foreign loanwords (including Arabic, English, Portuguese, and Dutch words) were excluded.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consonantal Debuccalization and Deletion in Minangkabau

Batais

2024

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While there are many useful studies on Indonesian native phonology and loanword phonology, none has yet explored Minangkabau loanword phonology in depth. Therefore, based on a list of 52 well-established native Indonesian loanwords elicited from 10 adult native speakers of Minangkabau and verified by native speakers and transcribed in IPA, and within the ambit of Optimality Theory, this paper aims to investigate the following research questions: What are the phonotactic repair strategies employed in Minangkabau to adapt these words? Why are they triggered? Are they phonologically or phonetically driven? And why? The study finds that the two observed repairs are consonantal debuccalization and consonantal deletion, which are both employed in order to fulfill the phonotactic conditions of Minangkabau. In Minangkabau, obstruent and liquid consonants are disallowed word-finally; as a result, word-final voiceless stops /p, t, k/ in native Indonesian words are debuccalized into the glottal stop /ʔ/, and the voiceless fricative /s/ into the glottal fricative /h/. However, unlike word-final obstruents, the word-final liquid consonants /r, l/ in native Indonesian words are adapted through deletion when entering Minangkabau. The results, moreover, show that that the above repair strategies are guided by phonology rather than phonetics; that is to say, among others, they are guided by coda restrictions in Minangkabau phonotactics in terms of word-final obstruent and liquid consonants. Finally, by presenting evidence from Minangkabau in favor of the phonological stance, it is believed that the paper contributes to the significant debate as to whether loanword adaptation is phonological or phonetic.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consonantal Debuccalization and Deletion in Minangkabau

Batais

2024

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Data sekunder bersumber dari studi pustaka melalui kosakata dasar Swadesh di Kabupaten Berau (Kurniawati & dkk., 2002). Kamus Indonesia-Minangkabau, dan kamus Minangkabau-Indonesia (Burhanuddin & Zabadi, 2013); (Rusmali & dkk., 1985).…”

Section: Metodeunclassified

Leksikostatistik Dan Glotokronologi Bahasa Berau Dengan Bahasa Minangkabau

Mayangsari,

Inderajati

2023

Widyaparwa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study is a lexicostatistical and glottochronological study that aims to classify words by prioritizing time calculations or calculating the age of relatives’ languages. This research is focused on Berau and Minangkabau languages. The people who speak the Berau Language are people of the Berau tribe in Berau District, East Kalimantan. Meanwhile, the Minangkabau language is spoken by people in the Province of West Sumatra (except the Mentawai Islands), western Riau Province, and Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. The collection phase used the referential equivalent method, the data analysis stage used the lexicostatistical and glotochronological methods. Moreover, the results of data analysis used informal and formal methods. The theory used is sound correspondence, lexicostatistics, and glottochronology. The analysis shows some points such as 37 pairs of identical, 46 pairs of phonemic correspondences, 1 pair of different phonemes, and 44 pairs of similar forms. Lexicostatistical calculations show that the percentage of kinship between Berau and Minangkabau languages is 67%. Berau and Minangkabau languages were single languages in 1.053–787 years ago. Berau and Minangkabau languages have been separated from the proto-language between 970–1.236 BC (calculated from 2023).Kajian ini merupakan kajian leksikostatistik dan glotokronologi yang bertujuan mengelompokkan kosakata kerabat dengan menekankan perhitungan waktu pisah atau usia bahasa kerabat. Penelitian ini menitikberatkan pada bahasa Berau dengan bahasa Minangkabau. Bahasa Berau dituturkan oleh masyarakat yang ada di suku Berau, Kabupaten Berau, Kalimantan Timur. Adapun bahasa Minangkabau dituturkan oleh masyarakat di wilayah Provinsi Sumatera Barat (kecuali Kepulauan Mentawai), bagian barat Provinsi Riau, dan Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Tahap pengumpulan menggunakan metode padan referensial, tahap analisis data menggunakan metode leksikostatistik dan glotokronologi. Adapun metode penyajian hasil analisis data menggunakan metode informal dan formal. Teori yang digunakan yaitu korespondensi bunyi, leksikostatistik, dan glotokronologi. Hasil analisis diperoleh 37 pasangan identik, 46 pasangan korespondensi fonemis, 1 pasang fonem berbeda, dan 44 pasangan bentuk mirip. Penghitungan leksikostatistik menunjukkan bahwa persentase kekerabatan bahasa Berau dan bahasa Minangkabau sebanyak 67%. Bahasa Berau dan bahasa Minangkabau merupakan bahasa tunggal pada 1.053–787 tahun yang lalu. Bahasa Berau dan bahasa Minangkabau mulai berpisah dari bahasa proto antara 970 SM–1.236 SM (dihitung dari tahun 2023).

show abstract

“…Beside from geographical location, the kinship relationship of Karo, Pakpak, and Gayo languages can be seen from the sound and the same phonemes. Language kinship can be investigated through the analysis of meaning components in determining the meaning relationship between a set of lexemes in a meaning field [10]. The kinship of Karo, Pakpak, and Gayo languages can be seen in the following data.…”

Section: Gayo Languagementioning

confidence: 99%

The Kinship of Karo, Pakpak and Gayo Language

Sitorus

Widayati

2022

AJESS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims: To investigate and to know the kinship of Karo, Pakpak and Gayo language. Study Design: This research used quantitative research Place and Duration of Study: Medan, North Sumatera, March 2022-June 2022 Methodology: In this case, the writers used a lexicostatistic approach to determine the level of kinship in Karo, Pakpak, and Gayo languages by comparing the vocabulary contained in these languages and then seeing and determining the similarity of the vocabulary of the three languages. In this case, the basic swadesh vocabulary of 200 words was used to determine the percentage of cognates. Results: The result of the research shown that the kindship of Karo and Pakpak is at family level. The number of cognate words of Karo and Pakpak 140 word and non-cognate 60 words. Furthermore, the kinship of Pakpak and Gayo is at family level with the number of kindship of Pakpak and Gayo 82 words and non-cognate 118 words and the kinship of Pakpak and Gayo is at family level with the number of kindship of Pakpak and Gayo 76 words and non-cognate 124 words. Conclusion: Based on the findings, it was found that the level of kinship between Karo and Pakpak languages was 70% with a separation period about 500-2500 years ago. From this percentage, it can be stated that Karo and Pakpak languages have a close relationship. While the level of kinship between Pakpak and Gayo languages is 41% whereas Karo Gayo 38%, it means that the kinship relationship between Pakpak and Gayo languages and also Karo and Gayo Language are not close even though the relationship between the two languages belongs to the family. However, if it is seen from the percentage, both of them is not close. And the separation period of Pakpak and Gayo languages was around 500-2500 years ago. This means that the two languages have been separated for a long time.

show abstract

Istilah Kekerabatan Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Minangkabau: Analisis Kontrastif dalam Pemelajaran Bahasa

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Consonantal Debuccalization and Deletion in Minangkabau

Consonantal Debuccalization and Deletion in Minangkabau

Leksikostatistik Dan Glotokronologi Bahasa Berau Dengan Bahasa Minangkabau

The Kinship of Karo, Pakpak and Gayo Language

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About