1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-0248(99)00019-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues in thin film PV manufacturing cost reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Flexible stainless steel (StS) substrates are clearly cheaper compared to TCO glass 2,3 and also suitable for roll-to-roll mass production. StS has been used both as counter electrode (CE) [4][5][6][7][8] and photoelectrode (PE) substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Flexible stainless steel (StS) substrates are clearly cheaper compared to TCO glass 2,3 and also suitable for roll-to-roll mass production. StS has been used both as counter electrode (CE) [4][5][6][7][8] and photoelectrode (PE) substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the high cost and low material utilisation of the equipment used to produce these layers may be a barrier to their commercialisation and will increase the cost of the electricity generated by CIGS-based systems [3]. Nonvacuum techniques for CIGS deposition offer potential reductions in capital cost and many such techniques have been investigated [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[44][45][46][47] Assumed annual plant production and yields ranged from 60 MW and 88% 44 to 3 GW and 93%. 47 These studies assumed module efficiencies only slightly higher than today's values; 7-9% for a-Si; and 10-12% for CdTe and Cu (InGa)Se 2 .…”
Section: Reducing the Cost Of Tfsc Via Large Scale Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%