2016
DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isoflurane MAC determination in dogs using three intensities of constant-current electrical stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Degree of analgesia was assessed according to a methodology adapted from Figueiró et al (2016), using an electrical stimulator connected to a pair of stainless steel needles spaced by 3cm and subcutaneously inserted into the tail ventral base. Each stimulus was applied by increasing the constant current (in mA) until a positive response was observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Degree of analgesia was assessed according to a methodology adapted from Figueiró et al (2016), using an electrical stimulator connected to a pair of stainless steel needles spaced by 3cm and subcutaneously inserted into the tail ventral base. Each stimulus was applied by increasing the constant current (in mA) until a positive response was observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analgesia was monitored only as of the beginning of continuous infusion of the TZ combination (form times M5 to M60) considering that electrical stimulation in dogs is an alternative to the supramaximal mechanical noxious stimulation through tail-base clamp (Yamashiro et al 2015). Thus, current intensities ≥30mA are considered supramaximal noxious stimuli for the same anatomical site in the tail (Figueiró et al 2016) Myorelaxation was evaluated based on the degree of extensor rigidity and resistance of the limbs to manipulation and on muscle tone; this parameter was rated as follows: excellent (score 2), when total muscle flaccidity was evident; good (score 1), when moderate maintenance of muscle tone was observed, with occurrence of discrete tremors; poor (score 0), if the animal showed tremors and stiffness, state of catalepsy, or intense movement. The quality of recovery after anesthesia was evaluated according to the following scores: excellent (score 2), when the animal rested quietly, but responsively; good (score 1), when the animal showed moderate excitement; poor (score 0), when it showed agitation, tremors and/or myoclonus (Cardoso et al 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isoflurane MAC was determined following a bracketing technique by using a square-wave electrical noxious stimulus of 30 mA and 50 Hz applied to the cranial aspect of the tarsus by two stainless steel needles subcutaneously positioned approximately 3 cm apart [ 26 ]. This noxious stimulation was sustained for 60 seconds or until a positive response was observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical planes of anesthesia are usually at 1.2 to 1.4 times the MAC, which are close to 1.69% of isoflurane in dogs (Figueiró et al, 2016). Vettorato et al (2010) have observed values between 1.3 and 1.4% (approximately 1 MAC) at the start of surgery with tramadol analgesia, corroborating another study reporting lower ET´I SO after tramadol analgesia in dogs (Mastrocinque and Fantoni, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%