2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISO 9001 and product innovation: A literature review and research framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
109
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
109
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The review showed that the more recent empirical academic literature has not focused on analyzing the effect that QM has on corporate sustainability in general and on EM practices in particular. Two types of studies were identified, according to their main outcomes: those establishing a negative relationship between QM and EM (see Table 3), which are in the minority (e.g., [69][70][71][72]), and those reporting positive results (see Table 4), stating that QM is closely related to the promotion of EM, and innovation in EM in particular (e.g., [24][25][26][27][28]35,36,42,[73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]). Other authors, such as Steiber and Alänge [73], point out that while some aspects of QM could actually bring benefits to EM (e.g., environmental innovation), the question of whether QM as a whole does so is not very clear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review showed that the more recent empirical academic literature has not focused on analyzing the effect that QM has on corporate sustainability in general and on EM practices in particular. Two types of studies were identified, according to their main outcomes: those establishing a negative relationship between QM and EM (see Table 3), which are in the minority (e.g., [69][70][71][72]), and those reporting positive results (see Table 4), stating that QM is closely related to the promotion of EM, and innovation in EM in particular (e.g., [24][25][26][27][28]35,36,42,[73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]). Other authors, such as Steiber and Alänge [73], point out that while some aspects of QM could actually bring benefits to EM (e.g., environmental innovation), the question of whether QM as a whole does so is not very clear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standards may also positively contribute to the innovation performance of firms (Manders 2016;Pekovic and Galia 2009;Ratnasingam et al 2013;Sadikoglu and Zehir 2010), and consequently productivity. This may be the case when, in preparation to obtain a certificate, firms upgrade their existing capital stock and invest in new-vintage machinery and equipment (e.g.…”
Section: Standards Certification and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars have associated certifications, in particular those related to ISO 9001, with larger reductions in product costs (Corbett, Montes-Sancho, and Kirsck, 2005); better financial performance (Sharma, 2005); and higher rates of corporate survival as well as increasing sales, employment, and wages (Levine and Toffel, 2010). Moreover, literature has shown that certification increases revenues because quality certification allows firms to access new markets and customers (Singh, Power, and Chuong, 2011), has positive impacts on innovative behavior (Manders, de Vries, and Blind, 2016), or improves the capabilities of human capital (Lo, Wiengarten, Humphreys, et al, 2013). Contrary to these positive impacts, other studies for developed economies found that QMS certifications do not necessarily increase financial performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%