2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Ring Breaking Feasible in Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations?

Abstract: Our interest is relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations based on molecular simulations. These are promising tools for lead optimization in drug discovery, computing changes in binding free energy due to modifications of a lead compound. However, in the “alchemical” framework for RBFE calculations, some types of mutations have the potential to introduce error into computed binding free energies. Here, we explore the magnitude of this error in several different model binding calculations. We find that s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Glycine mutations, which were considered in the FEP studies, require the ability to change the charge on the C α atom and to scale CMAP interactions by λ , which are not currently implemented in the CHARMM molecular dynamics package. Proline mutations are even more challenging, requiring topology changes via the opening of a ring . Such mutations could be allowed through the use of soft bonds and other advances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glycine mutations, which were considered in the FEP studies, require the ability to change the charge on the C α atom and to scale CMAP interactions by λ , which are not currently implemented in the CHARMM molecular dynamics package. Proline mutations are even more challenging, requiring topology changes via the opening of a ring . Such mutations could be allowed through the use of soft bonds and other advances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only current limit is that rings are required to be preserved. 40 With this strategy, a single topology description is achieved: any atom that does not match is made a dummy atom. FESetup allows equilibration of the solvated simulation systems and ensures that "forward" and "backward" simulations have the same number of total atoms.…”
Section: Rafe Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential source of problems is the alchemical perturbation itself: transformations between chemically very different ligands can make the simulations hard to converge, leading to longer, and thus more costly, simulations . This can be especially problematic in scaffold‐hopping modifications, when rings are closed or their size is changed in single‐topology approaches . However, this is not the case for dual‐topology approaches, and there has been significant progress to alleviate that problem in single‐topology approaches recently .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] This can be especially problematic in scaffold-hopping modifications, [6][7][8][9] when rings are closed or their size is changed in single-topology approaches. [10,11] However,t his is not the case for dual-topology approaches, [12] and there has been significant progress to alleviate that problem in single-topology approaches recently. [13] Finally,t he creation and annihilation of charges in an alchemical transformation is al ong-standing problem that has not been solved completely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%