2018
DOI: 10.1002/pro.3500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaching protein design with multisite λ dynamics: Accurate and scalable mutational folding free energies in T4 lysozyme

Abstract: The estimation of changes in free energy upon mutation is central to the problem of protein design. Modern protein design methods have had remarkable success over a wide range of design targets, but are reaching their limits in ligand binding and enzyme design due to insufficient accuracy in mutational free energies. Alchemical free energy calculations have the potential to supplement modern design methods through more accurate molecular dynamics based prediction of free energy changes, but suffer from high co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(167 reference statements)
1
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MSλD is a rigorous free-energy simulation method able to calculate changes in protein binding affinity in response to point mutations (92,93). Compared to other freeenergy simulation methods, MSλD is highly efficient, requiring an order of magnitude less computation than standard approaches without loss of precision, and it facilitates sampling of different perturbations at multiple sites in a single simulation (92,(94)(95)(96)(97). This offers the advantage of exploring non-additive effects between multiple point mutations within a protein simultaneously (95).…”
Section: Molecular Modeling Quantifies the Contributions Of Individuamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…MSλD is a rigorous free-energy simulation method able to calculate changes in protein binding affinity in response to point mutations (92,93). Compared to other freeenergy simulation methods, MSλD is highly efficient, requiring an order of magnitude less computation than standard approaches without loss of precision, and it facilitates sampling of different perturbations at multiple sites in a single simulation (92,(94)(95)(96)(97). This offers the advantage of exploring non-additive effects between multiple point mutations within a protein simultaneously (95).…”
Section: Molecular Modeling Quantifies the Contributions Of Individuamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A soft-core Lennard Jones potential was used to scale all nonbonded interactions for the alchemical substituents by λ (94). Substituents dihedral angles were scaled by λ while bonds, angles, and improper dihedral angles were not, as this was found previously to yield better sampling without causing conformations to become trapped in local energy minima (95,97). The adaptive landscape flattening (ALF) algorithm was used to identify appropriate biasing potentials for MSλD (94,95).…”
Section: Molecular Modeling Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where α=0.017, and =0.18 were previously optimized to yield good fits to free energy profiles for a variety of systems. [14][15][16] The set of constants, { }, { , }, { , }, and { , } are optimized during bias optimization. The bias optimization algorithm is iterative in nature where short MSLD simulations are run, followed by calculation of free energy landscapes.…”
Section: = + + +mentioning
confidence: 99%