1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00265-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is radical hepatic surgery safe?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
34
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of perihepatic infected fluid collections has been reported to be 2 % to 20 %, biliary fistulas occurrence was up to 8 % of patients [18] . Brancatisano showed similar perioperative mortality (2.5 %) in radical major hepatic surgery by TVE but with a lower postoperative complication rate (about 46 %) than that of ours [19] . At present, it is generally accepted that liver resection performed under intermittent warm ischema is a safe and well-tolerated modality in patients with and without cirrhotic livers [20] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The frequency of perihepatic infected fluid collections has been reported to be 2 % to 20 %, biliary fistulas occurrence was up to 8 % of patients [18] . Brancatisano showed similar perioperative mortality (2.5 %) in radical major hepatic surgery by TVE but with a lower postoperative complication rate (about 46 %) than that of ours [19] . At present, it is generally accepted that liver resection performed under intermittent warm ischema is a safe and well-tolerated modality in patients with and without cirrhotic livers [20] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…[85][86][87][88][89] These statistics cannot be directly applied to healthy donors, but they raise appropriate concern. Left lateral segment resection is sufficiently safe, but relatively few extensive resections have been performed in this population.…”
Section: Resection Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a great deal of variability between studies, but liver failure is the immediate cause of 40% to 80% of deaths after major hepatic resection, 85,87,89 and cirrhosis and extensive resections are frequently associated. 85,[87][88][89] Several recent studies including large numbers of patients failed to show an association between the extent of resection and morbidity and mortality, 85,90 probably reflecting the appropriate exclusion of those at high risk. In a series of patients with positive hepatitis serological results, liver failure did not occur in any patient with a remnant liver volume greater than 250 mL.…”
Section: Resection Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the vast majority of hepatectomies aminotransferase elevations are described on a temporary basis, returning to normal levels by the end of a few days, a fact observed in these cases. Even in patients who underwent resections without vascular clamping without bleeding these enzymes show an increase in their baseline values, demonstrating that the surgical impact on the liver may be your main driver, and do not represent degree of functional impairment 1,2,6 . The authors' impression is that the necrosis obtained with the method is not primarily responsible for the elevated transaminases, since, regardless of the size of the resection, the change in liver function tests, postoperative, was similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%