2009
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2008.057729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is propofol a safe and effective sedative for relocating hip prostheses?

Abstract: Significant adverse effects of propofol in this case series were uncommon (12/98 patients) and readily countered. This case series suggests that propofol is a safe and effective sedative for relocating hip prostheses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date we have only found one report of a patient requiring intubation while receiving propofol for deep sedation in the ED, this patient suffered no sequelae [6]. The SE rate of 19% in our study is consistent with the reports in the literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Respiratory events in studies using propofol for sedation in an ED setting range from 1.4% [3] to almost 60% [11], the latter included only ASA All variables are in whole numbers (%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date we have only found one report of a patient requiring intubation while receiving propofol for deep sedation in the ED, this patient suffered no sequelae [6]. The SE rate of 19% in our study is consistent with the reports in the literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Respiratory events in studies using propofol for sedation in an ED setting range from 1.4% [3] to almost 60% [11], the latter included only ASA All variables are in whole numbers (%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However a much higher desaturation rate was noted with midazolam suggesting that propofol might be a safer agent for use in the elderly [22]. In contrast to Mathieu et al [9] none of our patients required pressors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accident and emergency (A&Es) departments continue to draw inferences of 'safety' after describing sedation with propofol in limited numbers (without reference to 95% CI) and with little emphasis on maintaining verbal contact [16,17]. The Academy of Royal Colleges document on safe sedation practice, led by the Royal College of Anaesthetists but with members from all relevant specialties including the Faculty of Accident & Emergency Medicine, is very clear on this topic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the protocol). It is disappointing that A&E departments administering propofol sedation can erroneously be called safe when the airway event rate is 80 ⁄ 1000 [17], almost 30-fold higher than those described in anaesthetists. It has been stated that safety for alternative or non-standard techniques of sedation should be demonstrated in hundreds of patients [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%