2020
DOI: 10.2308/jata-19-021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Corporate Social Responsibility Related to Corporate Tax Avoidance? Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Abstract: We employ states' enactment of constituency statutes as plausibly exogenous shocks to the marginal cost of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and examine the relation between CSRand corporate tax avoidance. We find almost no evidence of an association between the enactment of constituency statutes and tax avoidance. We use confidence intervals and other analysis to rule out low power as an explanation. Using an instrumental variables design, we find evidence that third-party CSR scores increase following co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies examine the corporate tax implications of CSR mandates. Mayberry and Watson (2021) exploit state-level constituency statutes that allow firms to consider the interests of broad stakeholder groups as exogenous variation in firms' CSR activities and examine corporate tax implications. They find no evidence of an association between the enactment of state-level constituency statutes and corporate tax avoidance, suggesting that firms decouple CSR and tax policy.…”
Section: Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies examine the corporate tax implications of CSR mandates. Mayberry and Watson (2021) exploit state-level constituency statutes that allow firms to consider the interests of broad stakeholder groups as exogenous variation in firms' CSR activities and examine corporate tax implications. They find no evidence of an association between the enactment of state-level constituency statutes and corporate tax avoidance, suggesting that firms decouple CSR and tax policy.…”
Section: Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, firms with better CSR performance can bear the negative sanction associated with undertaking aggressive tax avoidance (Hoi et al ., 2013), giving rise to a negative relation between CSR and ETRs. Third, the decoupling view suggests that firms do not link CSR with tax policies, resulting in no relation (Mayberry and Watson, 2021).…”
Section: Esg/csr and Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the conflicting results can be due to CSR and ETRs are both being endogenously determined, and the two studies do not utilize any exogenous changes in CSR for identification. To address this concern, Mayberry and Watson (2021) use the enactment of constituency statutes as an exogenous shock to CSR engagement and find no significant impacts of CSR on the cash ETR. Overall, how CSR engagement affects firms’ ETRs is still under debate, although the test based on a natural experiment suggests no relation (Mayberry and Watson, 2021).…”
Section: Esg/csr and Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in a recent US work, Mayberry and Watson (2020) take issue with the use of third-party CSR ratings, such as the KLD index, in prior CSR-tax avoidance work, noting endogeneity and validity concerns as well as selection bias, as firms may undertake activities to manipulate ratings. This study uses the enactment of states' constituency statutes, which reduce the marginal cost of CSR activities, as a natural experiment.…”
Section: Csr and Tax Avoidance Policies Of The Firmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When examining the relationship between tax avoidance and CSR, many studies proxy for CSR using third-party rating systems, such as KLD. Given concerns raised by Mayberry and Watson (2020), another avenue to further the CSR-tax avoidance literature is to consider other ways to capture the concept of social responsibility without relying solely on third-party measures or a firm's own disclosures. To this end, prior literature has examined various characteristics of the firm's location and operating environment, under the premise that the social and moral characteristics of the population surrounding the firm will spill over to affect corporate culture and influence firm decisions.…”
Section: The Effect Of the Firm's Operating Environment And Societymentioning
confidence: 99%