2017
DOI: 10.5935/0103-507x.20170046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is APACHE II a useful tool for clinical research?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(24 reference statements)
3
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous findings, 1517 we also found that a higher percentage of patients who died underwent mechanical ventilation and used vasoactive drugs compared with those who survived. Non-survivors also had significantly higher APACHE II scores than did survivors, which indicated that these patients had more severe illness than those who survived.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with previous findings, 1517 we also found that a higher percentage of patients who died underwent mechanical ventilation and used vasoactive drugs compared with those who survived. Non-survivors also had significantly higher APACHE II scores than did survivors, which indicated that these patients had more severe illness than those who survived.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Limited evidence suggests that low serum iron levels, high transferrin levels, and low transferrin saturation are associated with morbidity and mortality of critically ill patients in the ICU. 2 Consistent with previous findings, [15][16][17] we also found that a higher percentage of patients who died underwent mechanical ventilation and used vasoactive drugs compared with those who survived. Nonsurvivors also had significantly higher APACHE II scores than did survivors, which indicated that these patients had more severe illness than those who survived.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For many years, many scoring systems have been used in intensive care units to predict mortality and morbidity. Among these systems, APACHE II is accepted as the most successful scoring system in predicting mortality in all intensive care types and different patient groups (9,10 ). In some articles, it has been reported to be successful in COVID 19 patients (11,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os dados foram coletados diariamente, desde admissão do paciente na UTI até o momento de alta para unidade de internação, por meio de um instrumento estruturado de coleta, constituído das variáveis: dados de identificação, demográficos, clínicos (doenças pregressas, medicamentos em uso e exames laboratoriais pré-cirurgia), cirúrgicos (tempo de cirurgia, tempo de circulação extracorpórea, uso de drogas vasoativas, tempo de intubação, exames laboratoriais pós-cirurgia e tipo de cirurgia), período de internação na UTI e índice prognóstico Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) 10 .…”
Section: Métodounclassified