2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2011.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrelevant stimuli produce a path deviation in a driving-simulation task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a starting point for this research, I took into account the data from my own previous studies (Vilchez & Tornay, 2012) regarding the key role of the contextual meaning of cues in the effect produced on movement; Lee's (1999) results and his demonstration of nonsignificant differences between exogenous and endogenous attentional capture on their effects on movement; and the different manners of representation of obligation and prohibition (Castro et al, 2008) to explain differential effects in the processing of directional endogenous cues. By using an endogenous cue with directional meaning, I wanted to change the meaning of the cue used for my previous works and, therefore, the effect on movement already found (Vilchez & Tornay, 2012)-following the Meaning-Dependent Response Activation Model (Vilchez, 2013) and using a continuous and close-to-real-driving tracking task.…”
Section: Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a starting point for this research, I took into account the data from my own previous studies (Vilchez & Tornay, 2012) regarding the key role of the contextual meaning of cues in the effect produced on movement; Lee's (1999) results and his demonstration of nonsignificant differences between exogenous and endogenous attentional capture on their effects on movement; and the different manners of representation of obligation and prohibition (Castro et al, 2008) to explain differential effects in the processing of directional endogenous cues. By using an endogenous cue with directional meaning, I wanted to change the meaning of the cue used for my previous works and, therefore, the effect on movement already found (Vilchez & Tornay, 2012)-following the Meaning-Dependent Response Activation Model (Vilchez, 2013) and using a continuous and close-to-real-driving tracking task.…”
Section: Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using an endogenous cue with directional meaning, I wanted to change the meaning of the cue used for my previous works and, therefore, the effect on movement already found (Vilchez & Tornay, 2012)-following the Meaning-Dependent Response Activation Model (Vilchez, 2013) and using a continuous and close-to-real-driving tracking task.…”
Section: Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Vilchez and Tornay (2012) showed that the effect of attentional cues on trajectory movement is explained by their meaning. This meaning of cues has been proven to be also modulated by the presentation setting (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism has been proposed to be efficient but not entirely effective (e.g. Vilchez and Tornay 2012). Continuous tasks, such as the tracking task (see Wickens and Hollands, 2000 for a review), are sensitive at assessing, upon movement, the lack of inhibitory effectiveness of our cognitive system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%