2006
DOI: 10.1079/ivp2006798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron formulation affects in vitro storage of hops: An image analysis

Abstract: SummaryIn vitro-stored plant germplasm is usually evaluated by visual analysis of the plant based on subjective characters. To reduce the variability in these evaluations, we developed a digital-image evaluation system for in vitro-stored plantlets. This study compares the standard visual evaluation system with a digital analysis system to determine if digital analysis can effectively quantify the health of diverse Humulus germplasm. Eight cultivars of Humulus lupulus L. were stored on standard Murashige and S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recent references have applied regression analyses to explain biological responses (Aynalem et al 2006;Mokhtassi et al 2006;Onyeka et al 2006;Sharma et al 2006;Zhu et al 2006;Browne 2007). In our opinion, only Onyeka et al (2006) and Zhu et al (2006) demonstrated that regression contributed to clarity of their biological results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some recent references have applied regression analyses to explain biological responses (Aynalem et al 2006;Mokhtassi et al 2006;Onyeka et al 2006;Sharma et al 2006;Zhu et al 2006;Browne 2007). In our opinion, only Onyeka et al (2006) and Zhu et al (2006) demonstrated that regression contributed to clarity of their biological results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore, data dispersion could not be observed. Aynalem et al (2006) estimated straight line functions, but some R 2 were as low as 0.40 and consequently the regression functions did not fit the data properly. Browne (2007) also estimated straight line functions but determination coefficients were extremely low (0.12 and 0.27).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Simple microcuttings were immersed in the encapsulating solution (AE enriched with sodium alginate at 2.5% (w/v) sodium salt of alginic acid) with medium viscosity and, subsequently, the alginate-coated propagules were immersed in Plant germplasm stored in vitro is usually evaluated by visual analysis based on subjective characters, which decreases accuracy. Aynalem et al (2006) developed a digital image assessment system for H. lupulus L. stored in vitro to reduce variability in these assessments. The cultivars were stored in standard MS medium with iron (chelated EDTA) and MS medium with 100 or 200 mg L −1 of Sequestrene 138 iron (chelated EDDHA).…”
Section: Reedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro techniques have been found to be useful in ex situ conservation of a number of plant species (VILLALOBOS and ENGELMANN, 1995), including meristem culture-derived virus-free germplasms (FLETCHER et al, 1998). The storage longevity of in vitro collections depends on many important factors such as explant type, culture medium composition and culture conditions (AYNALEM et al, 2006;FARAGÓ et al, 2008) According to REED et al (2003) the U.S. Department of Agriculture, ARS, National Clonal Germplasm Repository at Corvallis (Oregon, USA) maintains about 700 accessions of Humulus spp. germplasm in field collections, in pots in the screen house, and as tissue cultures in cold storage or as cryopreserved shoot tips in liquid nitrogen.…”
Section: In Vitro Storagementioning
confidence: 99%