2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1707195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative Cross-Dehydrogenative C(sp3)–H/X–H (X = C, N, S) Coupling Reactions

Abstract: The direct functionalization of C(sp3)–H bonds is an attractive research topic in organic synthetic chemistry. The cross-dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) reaction provides a simple and powerful tool for the construction of C–C and C–heteroatom bonds. Recently, some progress has been made in the iron-catalyzed aerobic oxidative CDC reactions. Here, we present recent developments in the direct functionalization of C(sp3)–H bonds catalyzed by simple iron salts with molecular oxygen as the terminal oxidant.1 Introd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(6 reference statements)
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intercalation capacity of Zn@C is not high, as evidenced by the broad reduction peak in CV curves (Figure 5b), which is a typical characteristic of capacitive processes. [ 57 ] Therefore, restraining the capacitive process by increasing the graphitization degree of CO 2 ‐derived carbon is one way to further enhance the aluminum storage of Zn@C. It is acknowledged that the graphitization of the CO 2 ‐derived carbon herein needs to be further increased. The strategy on tailoring the microstructure of the derived carbon during electrochemical reduction of CO 2 in molten salts have been well addressed, [ 6 ] with higher graphitization of carbon occurring in the presence of liquid metal (the herein protocol), sulfur oxides, [ 18,59 ] elevated temperature, [ 58,59 ] higher overpotential, and metallic catalysts [ 8,58 ] Another way to further improve the capacity is to optimize the content of Zn in Zn@C. As shown in Figure 5c and Figure S9b in the Supporting Information, the “Zn@C (6.4 wt% Zn)” possesses much higher capacity than “Zn@C (25 wt% Zn),” revealing that optimizing the Zn content is an effective way to further enhance the energy storage ability of CO 2 ‐derived carbon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intercalation capacity of Zn@C is not high, as evidenced by the broad reduction peak in CV curves (Figure 5b), which is a typical characteristic of capacitive processes. [ 57 ] Therefore, restraining the capacitive process by increasing the graphitization degree of CO 2 ‐derived carbon is one way to further enhance the aluminum storage of Zn@C. It is acknowledged that the graphitization of the CO 2 ‐derived carbon herein needs to be further increased. The strategy on tailoring the microstructure of the derived carbon during electrochemical reduction of CO 2 in molten salts have been well addressed, [ 6 ] with higher graphitization of carbon occurring in the presence of liquid metal (the herein protocol), sulfur oxides, [ 18,59 ] elevated temperature, [ 58,59 ] higher overpotential, and metallic catalysts [ 8,58 ] Another way to further improve the capacity is to optimize the content of Zn in Zn@C. As shown in Figure 5c and Figure S9b in the Supporting Information, the “Zn@C (6.4 wt% Zn)” possesses much higher capacity than “Zn@C (25 wt% Zn),” revealing that optimizing the Zn content is an effective way to further enhance the energy storage ability of CO 2 ‐derived carbon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the scan rate increases, the capacitive contribution increases and finally reaches to about 76.2 % at a scan rate of 10 mV s −1 , which is higher than that (72.0 %) of the PANI@SWCNT‐based cells (Figure c,d and Supporting Information, Figure S26). It is noted that capacitive charge storage enables a high cathode capacity . Furthermore, PANI(H + )@SWCNT electrodes still exhibit low ion energy barriers and fast kinetic conversion of PANI(H + ) even at long‐term cycles (Figure e and Supporting Information, Figure S27).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…[211] 2) 1D materials, such as carbon nanotube, [212] have only one dimension outside of the nanometric size range. 3) 2D materials have two dimensions outside of the nanometric size range, with the typical examples being graphene [213] and nanosheets. [214] Many LD materials exhibit very peculiar physical phenomena due to the specificity of the crystal structure.…”
Section: Low-dimensional Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%