2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2020.100282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron based chalcogenide and pnictide superconductors: From discovery to chemical ways forward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question of whether some specific crystal structure and bonding situation can facilitate superconducting pairing has intrigued chemists since shortly after the discovery of superconductivity. Hence, the connection between the superconducting critical temperature ( T c ) and aspects of the crystal structure is crucial yet poorly understood in all superconductors. This applies in particular for Fe- and Cu-based high- T c superconductors; the former also feature an electronic nematic coupled with a structural orthorhombic transition ( T s ) above T c . Fe superconductor materials crystallize in different space groups but share a common local structure feature, tetrahedrally coordinated Fe atoms. One important empirical discovery for the future of materials design is that in most Fe-based superconductors the maximal T c correlates with the average anion height above the Fe plane; the height depends on the geometry of the FeAs 4 or FeCh 4 (Ch = Te, Se, or S) tetrahedron . The geometry also regulates the correlation strength due to average Fe–As­(Ch) hybridization, pointing to a spin fluctuation mechanism of pairing that governs the magnitude of T c . , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of whether some specific crystal structure and bonding situation can facilitate superconducting pairing has intrigued chemists since shortly after the discovery of superconductivity. Hence, the connection between the superconducting critical temperature ( T c ) and aspects of the crystal structure is crucial yet poorly understood in all superconductors. This applies in particular for Fe- and Cu-based high- T c superconductors; the former also feature an electronic nematic coupled with a structural orthorhombic transition ( T s ) above T c . Fe superconductor materials crystallize in different space groups but share a common local structure feature, tetrahedrally coordinated Fe atoms. One important empirical discovery for the future of materials design is that in most Fe-based superconductors the maximal T c correlates with the average anion height above the Fe plane; the height depends on the geometry of the FeAs 4 or FeCh 4 (Ch = Te, Se, or S) tetrahedron . The geometry also regulates the correlation strength due to average Fe–As­(Ch) hybridization, pointing to a spin fluctuation mechanism of pairing that governs the magnitude of T c . , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] Iron selenide nanowires are also obtained by annealing of pulsed laser deposited iron selenide thin films. [16] On the other hand, measurements of the energy-dispersive Xray spectroscopy (EDS) has shown that the FF films are composed of glass (SiO:Na Bringing to the mind that the ionic radius of Yb þ2 being 116 pm [17] is much larger than that of Fe þ4 (58.5 pm) [18] substitution of Yb in regular sites of Fe is not expected. However, as the bond length of Yb-Se (280.9 pm) is shorter than that of Yb-Yb (358.8 pm) [19] due to the stronger coulombic interactions unreacted (broken bonds) Se atoms capture Yb atoms and forms YbSe at the ultrathin interface between Yb and FeSe 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] Iron selenide nanowires are also obtained by annealing of pulsed laser deposited iron selenide thin films. [ 16 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous FebSc systems with various compositions and crystal structure classes are found still now. Different systems are distinguished for convenience by the stoichiometric proportions of the chemical components of their parent molecules [10,11]. The most common FebSc systems that use this nomenclature are 245, 1144, 42622, 12442, 1111, 111, 11, and [12][13][14][15][16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%