2018
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.8b00987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic Liquid-Carbon Nanotube Sensor Arrays for Human Breath Related Volatile Organic Compounds

Abstract: High sensitivity, selectivity, and stability are key requirements for carbon nanotube (CNT)-based sensors to realize their full potential in applications ranging from chemical warfare agent detection to disease diagnostics. Herein we demonstrate the sensing of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) relevant to human diseases using an array of chemiresistive carbon nanotube (CNT)-based sensors functionalized with ionic liquids (ILs). The ILs are fluid at ambient temperature and were selected to produce a discriminat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 12–18 ] These cross‐reactive sensory systems, inspired by mammalian olfactory and gustatory systems, can simultaneously detect and identify specific responses from a variety of non‐specific vapor, liquid elements, and their combinations by analyzing the difference in sensing responses with pattern recognition and machine learning algorithms. [ 19–27 ] Although these previous advances are noteworthy, it is still rather problematic to fully translate the cross‐reactive system into artificially perceptive electronics at this initial stage, possibly due to the lack of facile device architectures and appropriate protocols. More importantly, since most of the current e‐skin technologies are essentially based on “lock and key” approaches, the numeric data signals measured from the superposed stimuli could not be cross‐operated with each other, leaving the difficulty of decoupling interference of intermixed signals and of integrating cross interferences for recognizing the behavior of each stimulus.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 12–18 ] These cross‐reactive sensory systems, inspired by mammalian olfactory and gustatory systems, can simultaneously detect and identify specific responses from a variety of non‐specific vapor, liquid elements, and their combinations by analyzing the difference in sensing responses with pattern recognition and machine learning algorithms. [ 19–27 ] Although these previous advances are noteworthy, it is still rather problematic to fully translate the cross‐reactive system into artificially perceptive electronics at this initial stage, possibly due to the lack of facile device architectures and appropriate protocols. More importantly, since most of the current e‐skin technologies are essentially based on “lock and key” approaches, the numeric data signals measured from the superposed stimuli could not be cross‐operated with each other, leaving the difficulty of decoupling interference of intermixed signals and of integrating cross interferences for recognizing the behavior of each stimulus.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…72 The sensors identify different biomarkers due to the solubility, polarity, and chemical associations, especially for tuberculosis disease. 73 The design of an electronic nose with CNTs to delete the VOC of lung cancer patients was an inexpensive and rapid method. Water, methanol, isopropanol, ethanol, acetone, 2-butanone, and propanol were found as polar vapors lung cancer biomarkers.…”
Section: Using Carbon Nanotubes In Lung Cancer Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fabricate a sensor array with different selectivities, an effective strategy is to change the materials of the sensing interface. Various materials have been utilized as components of sensor arrays, including ionic liquids [15], single-stranded DNAs [16], reduced graphene oxide [17], and metalloporphyrin [14]. In particular, metalloporphyrin with different metal ligands has been preferably utilized as a sensing interface because of the ligands' different reactivities toward gas molecules in spite of their similar structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%