1968
DOI: 10.1139/p68-094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion reflection from a single crystal

Abstract: The scattering of Ar, Ne, and He ions from the Cu {100} face has been investigated by a digital computer technique; only binary elastic collisions of ions with the lattice atoms have been considered; the angular and energy distribution at various directions of incidence are discussed. The scattering by surface atomic chains and its contribution to the general picture of ion reflection were also studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

1970
1970
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At small scattering angles the high energy peak disappears, suggesting that in that case multiple collision processes cannot occur. This is in agreement with reports of Kivilis et al [3], Yurasova et al [2], Maskova et al [4], Heiland et al [5] and can easily be understood from the fact that at small angles of incidence and for low primary energy of the incoming ions not all possible impact parameters are permitted (surface atomic screening [6]. Analogous arguments explain the existence of a maximum scattering angle above which no scattering can occur.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At small scattering angles the high energy peak disappears, suggesting that in that case multiple collision processes cannot occur. This is in agreement with reports of Kivilis et al [3], Yurasova et al [2], Maskova et al [4], Heiland et al [5] and can easily be understood from the fact that at small angles of incidence and for low primary energy of the incoming ions not all possible impact parameters are permitted (surface atomic screening [6]. Analogous arguments explain the existence of a maximum scattering angle above which no scattering can occur.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The low energy peak can be identified with a mainly binary collision process, the other one with a multiple collision process. The energies corresponding to these peaks depend on the potential function between the collision partners, the angle of incidence, the scattering angle, the mass ratio and the distance between the surface atoms in the plane of incidence (in the case of multiple scattering) [ 1,2]. When at fixed angle of incidence, primary energy and mass ratio the relative energy of the peaks is plotted as a function of the scattering angle, the so-called multiple scattering loops are obtained ( fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental and theoretical work has been accompanied by a significant interest in digital computer simulation of the interaction processes, a study which is particularly suited to computation because of the many particle nature of the interactions. Various groups have studied (1) the motion of energetic ions slowing down by collision in a randomized or symmetric crystalline atomic array;(') (2) the motion of the atoms of an array when subjected to fast particle irradiation;@) (3) the ejection of atoms from a solid surface by ion irradiation (sputtering) which results from the motion of the atoms generated by the ions;@) (4) the scattering of low energy ions back from a solid surface; (4) and ( 5 ) the forward scattering and penetration of low energy ions into an irradiated solid. @) Preliminary work in the final category has been reported by the present authors who investigated the trajectories of low energy inert gas ions incident upon a planar array of four tungsten atoms simulating a representative area of the (100) surface of tungsten and computed the probability of ion penetration through the array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a = hEo [ln{C/AEo} -I] (10) Integration of the scattering equations following substitution of the approximate potential yields (5) …”
Section: Such Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%