2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2006.08.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion-implantation issues in the formation of shallow junctions in germanium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. As shown here and suggested by Simoen et al [9], very low levels of damage remain following implantation at 500°C. From this low damage level starting point, good activation of phosphorus is achieved due to the low level of stable defect complexes.…”
Section: Phosphorus Electrical Activationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…3. As shown here and suggested by Simoen et al [9], very low levels of damage remain following implantation at 500°C. From this low damage level starting point, good activation of phosphorus is achieved due to the low level of stable defect complexes.…”
Section: Phosphorus Electrical Activationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, the knowledge base and understanding of CMOS-related processing of Ge is still relatively small compared to that of Si. Pre-amorphization using self-implantation to create a continuous amorphous (a) layer is a commonly used processing step which reduces channeling effects and results in higher activation of subsequently implanted dopants during solid-phase epitaxial growth (SPEG) [4][5][6][7]. Moreover, understanding the SPEG process is crucial to optimizing the performance of CMOS devices [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A few hindrances exist, however, including the poor quality of the native surface oxide GeO 2 2 and the difficulty in obtaining high-enough n-type carrier concentrations for ultra-shallow junctions. 3 While the insulation issue has essentially been resolved by introducing high-j dielectrics as a replacement for SiO 2 a decade ago 4 (directly applicable to Ge), the doping limitations are still to be overcome. Hence, it is imperative to have more profound knowledge on the formation of defects and their role in the carrier compensation of Ge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%