1992
DOI: 10.2307/4002896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invited Synthesis Paper: Regulation of Tillering by Apical Dominance: Chronology, Interpretive Value, and Current Perspectives

Abstract: and as an area Extension agent with Colorado State University. Mr. Murphy is currently completing a Ph.D. program in plant physiology. His dissertation research focuses on the environmental, developmental, and physiological mechanisms that regulate tiller initiation in grasses. Mr. Murphy's research interests include physiological plant ecology, plant population ecology, photobiology and plantherbivore interactions. David D. Briske received his B.A. in botany fromNorth Dakota State University in 1973 and his P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
1
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(83 reference statements)
2
66
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Da primavera para o verão, a massa de colmos aumentou, provavelmente como resposta estímulo ao perfilhamento decorrente da desfolhação (Butler & Briske, 1988). Além disso, outras variáveis ambientais além da luminosidade (temperatura, condição hídrica) podem atuar no perfilhamento e ser tão importante quanto fatores hormonais no desenvolvimento de gemas e no estímulo ao perfilhamento (Murphy & Briske, 1992).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Da primavera para o verão, a massa de colmos aumentou, provavelmente como resposta estímulo ao perfilhamento decorrente da desfolhação (Butler & Briske, 1988). Além disso, outras variáveis ambientais além da luminosidade (temperatura, condição hídrica) podem atuar no perfilhamento e ser tão importante quanto fatores hormonais no desenvolvimento de gemas e no estímulo ao perfilhamento (Murphy & Briske, 1992).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Defoliation, however, decreased both realized and potential tiller recruitment via depression of axillary bud numbers. Axillary buds probably set a meristematic limit on future yields because they are the source of new tillers (Murphy and Briske 1992) and defoliation probably has a larger impact on potential yields than water stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El Perennial forage grasses in the Northern Great Plains are often grazed when moisture is limiting. If apical or intercalary meristems are removed by grazing, production of new tillers through activation of axillary buds is crucial to reestablish the photosyn-thetic canopy (Jewiss 1972 However, axillary bud numbers are important, because, as a source of new tillers, they set a meristematic limit for future yields in perennial grasses, (Murphy and Briske 1992). Grazing and drought may adversely affect the ability of these axillary buds to initiate new tillers, and negatively affect stand persistence (Busso et al 1989 (Lawrence and Ashford 1966).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apical meristem was apparently removed by mowing, necessitating development of new tillers for regrowth. Adequate moisture and optimum temperatures must exist before tiller buds are activated (Morrow and Power 1979;Busso et al 1989); light quantity and quality may also influence axillary bud activation (Olson and Richards 1988a;Murphy and Briske 1992). Conditions for emergence of new tillers were not met until the spring following defoliation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%