Invited article: A parallel process model of nonverbal communication

Patterson, Miles L.

doi:10.1007/bf02173410

Cited by 94 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 79 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, Clark and Wells (1995) state that, due to the highly threatening character of negative evaluation for individuals with SAD, respective individuals are strongly motivated to search for information and cues of how other persons view them in a given moment. Since affective states and attitudes are rarely communicated verbally but rather conveyed via facial expressions (Patterson, 1999), the faces of others are perceived as a valid indicator of social acceptance or rejection. Clark and Wells (1995) now argue that an attentional bias towards social threat exists because of the preoccupation with negative selfevaluation in SAD.…”

Section: Cognitive Biases In Face Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between social anxiety and perceived trustworthiness

Cooper

Doehrmann

Fang

et al. 2013

Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Cognitive Biases In Face Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between social anxiety and perceived trustworthiness

Cooper

Doehrmann

Fang

et al. 2013

Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Even though we showed the video twice to participants in most studies in order to desensitize them for the task at hand, it is conceivable that cognitive preoccupation may have prevented a more accurate self-diagnosis (e.g. Patterson, 1995).…”

Section: Low Cue Validity In Self-perceiversmentioning

confidence: 99%

The road to the unconscious self not taken: Discrepancies between self‐ and observer‐inferences about implicit dispositions from nonverbal behavioural cues

Hofmann

Gschwendner

2009

Eur J Pers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To what extent can individuals gain insight into their own or another person's implicit dispositions? We investigated whether self-perceivers versus neutral observers can detect implicit dispositions from nonverbal behavioural cues contained in video feedback (cue validity) and whether these cues are in turn used as a valid basis for explicit dispositional inferences (cue utilization). Across three studies in the domains of extraversion and anxiety we consistently obtained reliable cue validity and cue utilization for neutral observers but not for self-perceivers. An additional measure of state inferences in Study 3 showed that one reason for the lack of mediation in self-perceivers is their reluctance to use their state inferences as a basis for more general trait inferences. We conclude that people have a 'blind spot' with respect to the nonverbal behavioural manifestations of their unconscious selves, even though neutral observers may readily detect and utilize this information for dispositional inferences.

show abstract

“…First, more happy affect, implying heightened interactional involvement, could be expected to be associated with better NRA because under such circumstances a person would be interested in the other's behavior. On the other hand, more anxiety could be expected to be associated with worse NRA due to distraction or self-focus (Patterson, 1995;Schroeder, 1995).…”

Section: Accuracy Of Self-assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recall of Nonverbal Cues: Exploring a New Definition of Interpersonal Sensitivity

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interpersonal sensitivity, defined as the accurate recall of another person's nonverbal behavior, was measured in two studies. In Study 1, nonverbal recall accuracy (NRA) was based on recall of cues expressed by a man and/or woman being interviewed on videotape. Retest reliability after 2 weeks was satisfactory and the male and female tests demonstrated sufficient convergence. Participants could assess their own recall accuracy at better than chance levels; ability to decode the meanings of visual nonverbal cues was positively related to NRA; discriminant validity of NRA was demonstrated with regard to general cognitive ability; and women had higher NRA than men. In Study 2, NRA was based on recall of a live interaction partner. Women again had higher NRA than men; NRA was significantly better than chance; and higher NRA was associated with more smiling and self-reported positive affect during the interaction. Nonverbal recall accuracy is a promising new definition of interpersonal sensitivity.

show abstract

Invited article: A parallel process model of nonverbal communication

Cited by 94 publications

References 79 publications

Relationship between social anxiety and perceived trustworthiness

Relationship between social anxiety and perceived trustworthiness

The road to the unconscious self not taken: Discrepancies between self‐ and observer‐inferences about implicit dispositions from nonverbal behavioural cues

Recall of Nonverbal Cues: Exploring a New Definition of Interpersonal Sensitivity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About