1995
DOI: 10.1016/0039-9140(95)01517-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations for the determination of lead by in situ hydride trapping within a graphite electrothermal atomizer for routine analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the detection limit of the present procedure with some of the reported ones with detection by various spectrometric techniques were summarized in Table 3. It is obvious that the sensitivity of this procedure is much improved with respect to those of HG-AFS, 16,17 HG-AAS, 19,20 HG-AES, 21 HG-ETAAS, 22,23 direct sampling ETAAS, 24 and direct sampling ICPMS, 25 and it is even superior to or at least at the same level as those of the published procedures with HG-ICPMS 26,27 as well as various on-line preconcentration protocols with detection by ETAAS [28][29][30][31] and ICPMS. [32][33][34] In addition, Fig.…”
Section: Performance and Validation Of The Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the detection limit of the present procedure with some of the reported ones with detection by various spectrometric techniques were summarized in Table 3. It is obvious that the sensitivity of this procedure is much improved with respect to those of HG-AFS, 16,17 HG-AAS, 19,20 HG-AES, 21 HG-ETAAS, 22,23 direct sampling ETAAS, 24 and direct sampling ICPMS, 25 and it is even superior to or at least at the same level as those of the published procedures with HG-ICPMS 26,27 as well as various on-line preconcentration protocols with detection by ETAAS [28][29][30][31] and ICPMS. [32][33][34] In addition, Fig.…”
Section: Performance and Validation Of The Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Also, the determination of lead(II) has been widely done in various systems such as in human and artificial teeth blood, 5,[6][7][8] urine, 8,9 cookies, 10 baker's yeast, 11 ashes, coals, sediments, sludge, soils, freshwaters, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] drugs, 13 human hair, 14 wine, 1 seawater and minerals, [15][16][17] using different classical and instrumental techniques. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] One of the classical noninstrumental methods of preconcentrating samples which we have applied in our study is floatation. It is a well known technique for selective separation of valuable substances from ores, minerals and ect, 27-29 but today this technique is used mainly in other fields of chemical engineering and more rarely in analytical chemistry also.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wan et al 14 made a comprehensive summary of the detection limits for lead with detection by various spectrometric techniques (Table 3 in ref. 14), and concluded that the detection limit of their method was much improved with respect to those of HG-AFS, 14,30 HG-AAS, 10,31 HG-AES, 32 HG-ETAAS, 33,34 direct sampling ETAAS 17 and direct sampling ICP-MS, 18 and it is even superior to or at least at the same level as those of the published procedures with HG-ICP-MS 35,36 as well as various on-line preconcentration protocols with detection by ETAAS 9,11,15,37 and ICP-MS. 13,38 In comparison to the method reported by Wan et al with a detection limit of 4 ng L À1 , 14 the developed FI on-line SPE using macrocycle immobilized silica gel as sorbent coupled with HG-AFS in this work gives a similar detection limit (3 ng L À1 ), but offers an advantage of high selectivity, i.e. at least 200-1000 fold improvement in tolerance of coexisting ions (Table 3).…”
Section: Analytical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%