“…However, for ff and CRC, the only study including a higher proportion of women than men (52) showed a statistically significant positive association (RR ¼ 1.84, 1.15-2.94), whereas studies including a higher proportion of men than women (19,50,53) or an equal proportion of men/women (21,51,(54)(55)(56)(57) (Table I). From these, 4 studies also reported on BsmI (19,20,51,54) and 4 on Fok I (19,51,54,57). High heterogeneity in the analyses on TaqI (tt vs. TT) and CRC was due to 1 study (57) with very small number of cases (n ¼ 26).…”