2002
DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585-39.3.461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of theAedes(Stegomyia)flavopictusComplex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Japan by Sequence Analysis of the Internal Transcribed Spacers of Ribosomal DNA

Abstract: Aedes (Stegomyia) flavopictus Yamada is widely distributed in Japan and Korea. The species comprises three subspecies based on current morphological taxonomy: Aedes flavopictus in the Palearctic region of Japan, Ae. f downsi Bohart & Ingram from Amami and Okinawa Islands, and Ae. f miyarai Tanaka, Mizusawa & Ingram from Ishigaki and Iriomote Islands of the Ryukyu Archipelago. These subspecies designations are based on observations of a combination of several morphological characters, none of which, by itself i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al., 1979;Toma and Miyagi, 1986). e current classi cation is also supported by genetic analysis and comparison of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer regions (Toma et al 2002). In the present study, the mean intraspeci c variations for Ae.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…al., 1979;Toma and Miyagi, 1986). e current classi cation is also supported by genetic analysis and comparison of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer regions (Toma et al 2002). In the present study, the mean intraspeci c variations for Ae.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…albopictus (Kjer et al ., 1994; GenBank L22060) and Ae. flavopictus (Yamada) (Toma et al ., 2002; GenBank AF353541) and neighbour‐joining analyses were conducted using mega version 2.1 (Kumar et al ., 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the noncoding regions of ITS1 and ITS2 are highly variable and evolve at a faster rate than do the coding regions (Schlo¨tterer et al, 1994). The ITS2 sequence comparisons are popular for distinguishing closely related species (e.g., Porter & Collins, 1991;Paskewitz, Wesson & Collins, 1993;Cornel, Porter & Collins, 1996;Severini et al, 1996;Walton et al, 1999;Hackett et al, 2000), for differentiation of populations (Fritz et al, 1994;Marrelli et al, 1999), for study of divergence within and between species (Tang et al, 1996;, and for reconstruction of evolutionary relationships ( e.g., Wesson, Porter & Collins, 1992;Schlo¨tterer et al, 1994;Cornel, Porter & Collins, 1996;Miller, Crabtree & Savage, 1996;Xu & Qu, 1997;Depaquit et al, 2000;Weekers, De Jonckheere & Dumont, 2001;Oliverio, Cervelli & Mariottini, 2002;Toma et al, 2002;Young & Coleman, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%