2014
DOI: 10.1002/pssc.201300616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of p‐contact layers for BeZnSeTe/MgZnCdSe optical devices on InP substrates

Abstract: ZnTe and ZnSeTe p‐contact layers were investigated for use in BeZnSeTe/MgZnCdSe optical devices on InP sub‐strates. The contact resistances (Rc) of Au electrodes to N‐doped p‐ZnTe and p‐ZnSeTe contact lay‐ers were evaluated using the circular transmission line model (c‐TLM) method. A lower Rc (3.1×10‐3 Ωcm2) was obtained for the ZnSeTe p‐contact sample than for the ZnTe sample (6.3×10‐3 Ωcm2). BeZnSeTe/MgZnCdSe yellow‐light‐emitting devices with a ZnTe or ZnSeTe p‐contact layer grown on InP substrates were cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(a) and (b), to calculate the optical field distributions in the waveguides. The first LD structure was a conventional structure; it is a separate confinement heterostructure (SCH) comprising an undoped BeZnTe (1 monolayer (ML))/ZnSeTe (9 ML) SL (30 nm) active layer sandwiched between an un-MgSe (4 ML)/BeZnTe (6ML) SL (9 nm) p-side barrier layer and an un-MgSe (4ML)/BeZnTe (4 ML) SL (50 nm) n-side barrier layer, un-MgSe/ZnCdSe graded SL (61 nm) layer, n-MgSe (2 ML)/ZnCdSe (4 ML) SL (500 nm) n-cladding layer, and a p-MgSe (4 ML)/BeZnTe (6 ML) SL (600 nm) p-cladding layer [13]. The configuration of the second LD structure was the same as that of a conventional structure except for an ITO layer (400 nm) for the SL p-cladding layer, p-BeZnTe (20 nm), and p-ZnTe/BeZnTe SL (5 nm).…”
Section: Ld Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1(a) and (b), to calculate the optical field distributions in the waveguides. The first LD structure was a conventional structure; it is a separate confinement heterostructure (SCH) comprising an undoped BeZnTe (1 monolayer (ML))/ZnSeTe (9 ML) SL (30 nm) active layer sandwiched between an un-MgSe (4 ML)/BeZnTe (6ML) SL (9 nm) p-side barrier layer and an un-MgSe (4ML)/BeZnTe (4 ML) SL (50 nm) n-side barrier layer, un-MgSe/ZnCdSe graded SL (61 nm) layer, n-MgSe (2 ML)/ZnCdSe (4 ML) SL (500 nm) n-cladding layer, and a p-MgSe (4 ML)/BeZnTe (6 ML) SL (600 nm) p-cladding layer [13]. The configuration of the second LD structure was the same as that of a conventional structure except for an ITO layer (400 nm) for the SL p-cladding layer, p-BeZnTe (20 nm), and p-ZnTe/BeZnTe SL (5 nm).…”
Section: Ld Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…p-ZnTe (30 or 5 nm) p-contact layers were embedded in both structures. The graded SL was introduced to reduce the influence of the hetero barrier for electron injections at the interface between the n-side barrier and the n-cladding layers [13]. The ZnTe/BeZnTe SL and ZnTe p-contact layers of the ITO LD structure were embedded to reduce the contact resistance between the II-VI layers and ITO, and to inject holes into the active layer.…”
Section: Ld Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electrode geometry and size and the calculation method of R c were the same as those in Ref. [15].…”
Section: Contact Resistance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%