No abstract

Microarray successfully displayed characteristic differential cDNA expression between small and large cholangiocytes. This technique provides molecular information, which further supports our hypothesis that small and large bile ducts have different functions.

The molecular mechanisms of assembly and budding of hepatitis C virus (HCV) remain poorly understood. The budding of several enveloped viruses requires an endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), which is part of the cellular machinery used to form multivesicular bodies (MVBs). Here, we demonstrated that Hrs, an ESCRT-0 component, is critical for the budding of HCV through the exosomal secretion pathway. Hrs depletion caused reduced exosome production, which paralleled with the decrease of HCV replication in the host cell, and that in the culture supernatant. Sucrose-density gradient separation of the culture supernatant of HCV-infected cells revealed the co-existence of HCV core proteins and the exosome marker. Furthermore, both the core protein and an envelope protein of HCV were detected in the intraluminal vesicles of MVBs. These results suggested that HCV secretion from host cells requires Hrs-dependent exosomal pathway in which the viral assembly is also involved.

Galectin-3 expression was involved in the tumor progression and related to the prognosis of HCC. Our observations suggested that galectin-3 could be a novel tumor marker and therapeutic target.

Accumulating evidence suggests that cancer stem cells (CSC) play an important role in tumorigenicity. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is one of the markers that identifies tumor cells with high tumorigenicity. The expression of EpCAM in liver progenitor cells prompted us to investigate whether CSC could be identified in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines. The sorted EpCAM+ subpopulation from HCC cell lines showed a greater colony formation rate than the sorted EpCAM− subpopulation from the same cell lines, although cell proliferation was comparable between the two subpopulations. The in vivo evaluation of tumorigenicity, using supra‐immunodeficient NOD/scid/γcnull (NOG) mice, revealed that a smaller number of EpCAM+ cells (minimum 100) than EpCAM− cells was necessary for tumor formation. The bifurcated differentiation of EpCAM+ cell clones into both EpCAM+ and EpCAM− cells was obvious both in vitro and in vivo, but EpCAM− clones sustained their phenotype. These clonal analyses suggested that EpCAM+ cells may contain a multipotent cell population. Interestingly, the introduction of exogenous EpCAM into EpCAM+ clones, but not into EpCAM− clones, markedly enhanced their tumor‐forming ability, even though both transfectants expressed a similar level of EpCAM. Therefore, the difference in the tumor‐forming ability between EpCAM+ and EpCAM− cells is probably due to the intrinsic biological differences between them. Collectively, our results suggest that the EpCAM+ population is biologically quite different from the EpCAM− population in HCC cell lines, and preferentially contains a highly tumorigenic cell population with the characteristics of CSC. (Cancer Sci 2010)