2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Subharmonic Response of Individual Phospholipid Encapsulated Microbubbles at High Frequencies: A Comparative Study of Five Agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kwan and Borden 35 and Kooiman et al 23 present convincing microscopic images of heterogeneous lipid domains and ascribe this phenomenon to phase separation of the different lipid species on the bubble surface. Similar variations in the local lipid concentration on the shell have been found to affect the nonlinear behavior of DSPC microbubbles at high frequencies, 45 although no clear relation between the nonlinear response and shell microstructure was evident. Hosny et al 7 quantified the spatial distribution of viscosity in the microbubble shell using a fluorescence lifetime imaging technique and also found a large variation in viscosity that was correlated to differences in the ultrasound response of microbubbles of similar size.…”
Section: Shell Viscositymentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kwan and Borden 35 and Kooiman et al 23 present convincing microscopic images of heterogeneous lipid domains and ascribe this phenomenon to phase separation of the different lipid species on the bubble surface. Similar variations in the local lipid concentration on the shell have been found to affect the nonlinear behavior of DSPC microbubbles at high frequencies, 45 although no clear relation between the nonlinear response and shell microstructure was evident. Hosny et al 7 quantified the spatial distribution of viscosity in the microbubble shell using a fluorescence lifetime imaging technique and also found a large variation in viscosity that was correlated to differences in the ultrasound response of microbubbles of similar size.…”
Section: Shell Viscositymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…During calibration, a 0.2 -lm needle-type hydrophone (Precision Acoustics) was positioned approximately 2 mm from the sample holder membrane (a modified OptiCell V R with one membrane removed), such that the hydrophone location corresponded to the location of the ELIP during the optical measurement. The transmitted acoustic pressure amplitude in situ was attenuated by a factor of 3 dB relative to the free-field pressure due to the presence of the membrane and the 45 angle of incidence of the acoustic wave. The in situ pressure waveform and power spectrum for a 250 kPa peak pressure amplitude excitation pulse are shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Acoustic Excitation Pulsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…S6 A and B). majority of USCAs can only be used at frequencies < 5 MHz; as such, there is an increasing interest in extending contrast imaging to high frequencies useful for superficial tissue, such as carotid and breast (26,27). For this reason, we would like to emphasize that for all data reported above, we did ultrasound scans using a 12.5-MHz frequency, applying the tissue harmonic imaging (THI) modality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging, the chirp excitation also enhances the ultrasound scattering from microbubble populations and can achieve a better CTR. Even though phospholipid coated commercial UCAs and in-house produced microbubbles have different behavior, subharmonic emission efficiency, and disruption threshold [25]; their response to wideband excitation will be stronger since UCAs have a polydisperse size distribution. More microbubbles can be excited close to their resonance frequency, which also increases the nonlinear behavior of microbubbles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%