2009
DOI: 10.1163/9789087906788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Christian Privilege and Religious Oppression in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, school principals in Cagayan de Oro reinforced Christian hegemony, presenting Christian beliefs, values, customs, and mores as natural and normal (Blumenfeld et al, 2008). Grounded in a long history of colonization and Christianization, it was accepted that Christian ideology imbued government schooling and buttressed the socio-religious status quo of Cagayan de Oro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, school principals in Cagayan de Oro reinforced Christian hegemony, presenting Christian beliefs, values, customs, and mores as natural and normal (Blumenfeld et al, 2008). Grounded in a long history of colonization and Christianization, it was accepted that Christian ideology imbued government schooling and buttressed the socio-religious status quo of Cagayan de Oro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is a unique contribution to understanding how principal spirituality informs leadership (Blumenfeld et al, 2008;Capper et al, 2000;Dantley, 2003;Hermans and Koerts, 2013;Scanlan, 2011), especially in the non-western cultural contexts where there is need for a localized leadership inquiry (Cheng, 1995;Dimmock and Walker, 2000;Hallinger and Leithwood, 1996). To begin, I present a brief overview of the religious history of the island of Mindanao and its current educational context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as males in social work, though smaller in number, retain full ownership of the endowments of society, so do those who belong to religious majorities. Evangelical Protestants are the largest religious group in the nation (Pew Fomm on Religion and Public Life, 2008), have consistently contributed to national rbetoric and politics, and therefore represent a majority perspective (Blumenfeld, Joshi, & Fairchild, 2009; see also Dessel et al, 2011, for a more lengthy discussion of this). Although it may be convenient to rely on their numerical minority in a single setting-social work education-to suggest that they are among the oppressed, this assumption does not mesh with many years of work and thought regarding oppression, any of its known theories, or with social work's understanding of oppression (Bell, 2007;Melendez & LaSala, 2006;Todd & Coholic, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Clark et al, 2002, pp. 54 -55) Since that initial introduction to Christian privilege, several other scholars have also joined the conversation (Adams & Joshi, 2010;Blumenfeld, 2006;Blumenfeld, Joshi, & Fairchild, 2008;Case, 2013;Schlosser, 2003;Seifert, 2007). However, there are still many scholars who overlook, are skeptical of, or even deny the existence of Christian privilege.…”
Section: Recognizing and Challengingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, when programs ask participants to explain their religion to others, as speedfaithing events or pop-up conversations might do, it is important to recognize that doing so may place disproportionate pressure on participants from lesser-known and lesser-understood religions traditions to articulate (and sometimes defend) their religion to their peers. Hindus, for instance, may find themselves in a position where they have to rationalize the concept of reincarnation or the existence of multiple deities, while their Christian peers are not likely to encounter such bewilderment at the idea of a single lifetime or god (Blumenfeld et al, 2008; Edwards, 2016). Likewise, when programs organize educational lectures or panels of religious leaders, they run the risk of leaving audience members exposed to only a single interpretation of a given religion—a risk that threatens minority religions more than larger, more common religious groups.…”
Section: Acknowledging and Reflecting On The Sociocultural Nature Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%