Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v7i6.pp2929-2935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverted Diamond-shaped Notched Substrate and Patch for High-frequency Interference on Ultra-wideband Antenna

Abstract: <span>Notches loaded on a patch antenna can affect significantly on </span><em><span lang="AR-SA">‎</span></em><span>the antenna impedance matching. Therefore, notching technique is an efficient way to reduce </span><em><span lang="AR-SA">‎</span></em><span>the electromagnetic interference with unwanted bands. In this paper, a </span><em><span lang="AR-SA">‎</span></em><span>novel inverted diamond&… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first resonance frequency ( f 1 ) of the proposed asymmetrical side length of the hexagonal antenna was derived based on its radius ( R ) and the angle ( a ) instead of the unknown sides' length S 1 and S 2 . To the best of the author knowledge, the general Equation () is derived only in this study to calculate the f 1 of any asymmetrical hexagonal patch as: f1goodbreak=14.4[]()2goodbreak×Rgoodbreak+italicLggoodbreak+()2×R×sina×cos3aπεeffgoodbreak+italicWgtotal2πεeffgoodbreak+p×k. where f 1 was the first frequency of the antenna in GHz, ε eff was the effective dielectric constant, R was the radius of the circle that attached the patch corners in cm (see Figure 2B), a ° was the angle between the side S 1 , and the ground plane edge (0° < a ° < 45°), p was the prop spacing, and k = 1.15 was the constant dielectric loss for the FR4 substrate, Lg was the ground plane length in cm and Wg was the single ground plate width in cm (for CPW total area of two plates Wg total = 2 × Wg ) 27 …”
Section: Uwb Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first resonance frequency ( f 1 ) of the proposed asymmetrical side length of the hexagonal antenna was derived based on its radius ( R ) and the angle ( a ) instead of the unknown sides' length S 1 and S 2 . To the best of the author knowledge, the general Equation () is derived only in this study to calculate the f 1 of any asymmetrical hexagonal patch as: f1goodbreak=14.4[]()2goodbreak×Rgoodbreak+italicLggoodbreak+()2×R×sina×cos3aπεeffgoodbreak+italicWgtotal2πεeffgoodbreak+p×k. where f 1 was the first frequency of the antenna in GHz, ε eff was the effective dielectric constant, R was the radius of the circle that attached the patch corners in cm (see Figure 2B), a ° was the angle between the side S 1 , and the ground plane edge (0° < a ° < 45°), p was the prop spacing, and k = 1.15 was the constant dielectric loss for the FR4 substrate, Lg was the ground plane length in cm and Wg was the single ground plate width in cm (for CPW total area of two plates Wg total = 2 × Wg ) 27 …”
Section: Uwb Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The band-rejection can be achieved by implementing slots of certain lengths in the radiating patch or the feed line [6,[15][16][17][18][19][20]. In this design, a rotated C-shape slot is etched in the radiating patch as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: The Single Notch Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High data rates, large operation bandwidth, flat gain, and compactness the merits offered by microstrip ultra wide band antennas were so attractive for the new demands of the fast grow in mobile communications world [1]. But unfortunately, portions of the range (3.1-10.3 GHz) that is declared by federal communications commission (FCC) for ultra wide band (UWB) communications [2] can be used by other wireless technologies like WiMax, Cband, wireless local area network (WLAN), Xband, and international telecommunication union (ITU) that are granted the bands (3.3-3.6 GHz), (3.7-4.2 GHz), (5.15-5.825 GHz), (7.25-7.75 GHz), and (8.02-8.4 GHz) respectively [3]. Clearly, this dual use of the same frequencies by different wireless technologies can result in interference that requires antennas with filtering capabilities to prohibit the undesired radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%