Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks

Abstract

Human beings have always been intuitive toxicologists, relying on their senses of sight, taste, and smell to detect harmful or unsafe food, water, and air. As we have come to recognize that our senses are not adequate to assess the dangers inherent in exposure to a chemical substance, we have created the sciences of toxicology and risk assessment to perform this function. Yet despite this great effort to overcome the limitations of intuitive toxicology, it has become evident that even our best scientific methods still depend heavily on extrapolations and judgments in order to infer human health risks from animal data.Many observers have acknowledged the inherent subjectivity in the assessment of chemical risks and have indicated a need to examine the subjective or intuitive elements of expert and lay risk judgments. Such an examination was begun by surveying members of the Society of Toxciology and the lay public about basic toxicological concepts, assumptions, and interpretations. The results demonstrated large differences between toxicologists and laypeople, as well as differences between toxicologists working in industry, academia, and government. In addition, toxicologists were found to be sharply divided in their opinions about the ability to predict a chemical's effect on human health on the basis of animal studies. These results place the problems of risk communication in a new light. Although the survey identifies misconceptions that experts should clarify for the public, it also suggests that controversies over chemical risks may be fueled as much by limitations of the science of risk assessment and disagreements among experts as by public misconceptions. Neil et al. »• 5 Intuitive Toxicology

The effect of risk perception on public preferences and willingness to pay for reductions in the health risks posed by toxic cyanobacterial blooms

“…There are often marked discrepancies between peoples' perceptions of risk and that measured scientifically or "objectively" (Kraus et al, 1992;May and Burger, 1996;Campbell et al, 2002). The work of cognitive psychologists has shown that lay perceptions are often strongly influenced by a variety of personal, social and cultural factors.…”

Using risk model judgements to better understand perceptions of synergistic risks

“…A possible explanation is that, as indicated earlier, most individuals probably know very little about the effects of combining aspirin and clopidogrel and, more specifically, whether these two drugs might also result in health benefits as well as risks. Notably, research shows that lay individuals tend to perceive most medicinal drugs as beneficial (Kraus, Malmfors, & Slovic, 1992), and that subjective judgements' of risks and benefits are often confounded in individuals' minds (Alhakami & Slovic, 1994;Finucane, Alhakami, Slovic, & Johnson, 2000). Consequently, it is possible that many of the participants in Study 1 believed that the overall risk for the aspirinclopidogrel combination may be attenuated by the potential health benefits of the combination.…”

Can we learn from failure? Examining US experiences with nuclear repository siting

“…These differences include generally high levels of training, technical competence and professional ethics; unfortunately, there are also differences that can prove to be more problematic in making values-based decisions about technology. Scientists and engineers, for example, tend to place more emphasis on cost-containment and efficiency than do most citizens, while placing less emphasis on long-term safety (Fischhoff et al, 1981;Nealey and Hebert, 1983;Lynn, 1986;Freudenburg, 1988Freudenburg, , 1993Johnson and Petcovic, 1988;Kraus, 1992;Flynn et al, 1994). These choices, to note the obvious, can fail to provide precisely the kind of extra protection of public health and safety that is often being sought by the citizens who call for a 'more scientific' approach to environmental risk decisions.…”