Handbook on the Geographies of Power 2018
DOI: 10.4337/9781785365645.00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Handbook on the Geographies of Power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Black Feminist authors such as Sylvia Wynter (1971; 2003), Katherine McKittrick (2013), and Vanessa Agard-Jones (2012), and other explorations in STS and other non-STS feminist praxis (Povinelli 2017; Puig de la Bellacasa 2017; 2021; Yusoff 2018; Lyons 2020; Stengers 2021) around human-soil relations in varied contexts, can help us account for this ubiquitous and metamorphic condition of agency and conceptual creations. Puig de la Bellacasa, for instance, rescues the elemental as a concept from early chemistry and geochemistry in studies of soil composition and mobilizes it to identify the parts and whole that make up the “soil community”—an assemblage that in “microbiopolitics” is called “microbiomes,” the multispecies biotic-abiotic collectives in the biogeochemical relations that constitute the soil as matter.…”
Section: The Earth: Neither Resource Nor Predationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Black Feminist authors such as Sylvia Wynter (1971; 2003), Katherine McKittrick (2013), and Vanessa Agard-Jones (2012), and other explorations in STS and other non-STS feminist praxis (Povinelli 2017; Puig de la Bellacasa 2017; 2021; Yusoff 2018; Lyons 2020; Stengers 2021) around human-soil relations in varied contexts, can help us account for this ubiquitous and metamorphic condition of agency and conceptual creations. Puig de la Bellacasa, for instance, rescues the elemental as a concept from early chemistry and geochemistry in studies of soil composition and mobilizes it to identify the parts and whole that make up the “soil community”—an assemblage that in “microbiopolitics” is called “microbiomes,” the multispecies biotic-abiotic collectives in the biogeochemical relations that constitute the soil as matter.…”
Section: The Earth: Neither Resource Nor Predationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pemba thus emerged as a matter that created unwelcome relationships insofar as, in the modern sciences, “eating earth” is assigned a pathological term: geophagy. In this way, the pemba consumed by the “earth-eaters” appears as the outcome of an undesirable soil-human relationship in which the earth is seen as “dead matter” (Wynter 2003: 267; Yusoff 2018: 211). Geophagy would thus describe a practice of women in racialized bodies and “Bushinengue culture” in the legally precarious territories composed by the colonial enclaves of the Plantationocene (Jolivet and Vernon 2007; Vernon 2018; Grotti 2017; Léglise, Léobal, and Migge 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this, power necessarily plays a central role in the process of collective agency formation, with new and evolving networks of relationships between individual agents and activities emerging together. These may take the form, for example, of new economic development fora and stakeholder networks ranging from regional development advisory groups, cluster groups, or investment groups, with each agent having their own vested interests and power bases (Coleman and Agnew, 2018).…”
Section: New Path Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this longstanding present absence, which endures in contemporary political geography, recent works by political geographers are engaging with the field of settler colonialism much more directly (Gentry et al, , Hawari, Plonski, & Weizman, , Hughes, , forthcoming; Machold, ; Naylor, Daigle, Zaragocin, Ramírez, & Gilmartin, ; De Leeuw & Hunt, ), focusing particularly on biopolitics, planning, urban geopolitics, and gendered and racialized foundations of settler colonialism (Farrales, ; Naylor et al, ). Indeed, Coleman and Agnew () argue that the settler colonial framework is of rising importance to the field of political geography. This growing engagement with settler colonial theory is highly significant in terms of how geographers study settler colonial formations and their linkages or disjunctures with other forms of empire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%