2001
DOI: 10.1145/568438.568455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation, 2nd edition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
2,520
1
53

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,891 publications
(2,732 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
2,520
1
53
Order By: Relevance
“…He has shown that left-associative grammar can be expressed as a finite-state grammar that orders words in terms of part-of-speech categories. Because we know that finitestate grammars can be acquired from positive evidence (Hopcroft & Ullman, 1979), this means that children should be able to learn left-associative grammars directly without triggering a logical problem. Given the fact that these grammars can parse sentences in a time-linear and psycholinguistically plausible fashion, they would seem to be excellent candidates for further exploration by child language researchers.…”
Section: Limiting the Class Of Grammarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He has shown that left-associative grammar can be expressed as a finite-state grammar that orders words in terms of part-of-speech categories. Because we know that finitestate grammars can be acquired from positive evidence (Hopcroft & Ullman, 1979), this means that children should be able to learn left-associative grammars directly without triggering a logical problem. Given the fact that these grammars can parse sentences in a time-linear and psycholinguistically plausible fashion, they would seem to be excellent candidates for further exploration by child language researchers.…”
Section: Limiting the Class Of Grammarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of our network naturally depends on the depth of the stack, and as such it can be replaced by a finite-state automaton (Hopcroft and Ullman, 1979). However, in this sense human parsing ability is also limited: no person can parse sentences with arbitrarily many levels of embeddings (Pinker, 1994).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that parsing of CER can be solved very efficiently by a stack (push-down automaton), with the necessary pop and push operations (Hopcroft and Ullman, 1979). Thus it would be a step forward to present a neurally plausible simple stack architecture that could parse CER.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the heuristic heuristic transformation rules used in the network construction preserve flask stoichiometry (Scheme 1), the nodes of the the resulting network representation correspond to the possible states of the reactive system with fixed stoichiometry. We refer to this network representation as the finite-state representation, by analogy with finite-state machines, 61 and contrast it with the commonly used representations of metabolic networks as interaction networks, in which individual metabolites are network nodes and network edges connect all reaction participants with each other. 5,32,62,63 The finite-state representation of the reaction network is a directed network with edge weights given by thermodynamic and / or kinetic parameter values.…”
Section: Probing the Chemistry Of The Formose Reaction Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%